Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP · 2024
Family Involvement During Comprehensive Developmental Evaluations: Perspectives of Diverse Mothers.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blakey Ariel O, Eilenberg Jenna Sandler, Cardona Nicole, Kizildag Deniz, Broder-Fingert Sarabeth, Feinberg Emily, Long Kristin A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and social support postdiagnosis (i.e., family involvement) can lead to improved outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disorders. Children of minority ethnic and racial groups are typically diagnosed later in childhood compared with White children, contributing to disparities in outcomes. Research has not yet explored family involvement during comprehensive developmental evaluations nor accounted for cross-cultural differences in family roles and involvement. This qualitative study sought to characterize the nature and impact of family involvement during the developmental evaluation process among racially and ethnically marginalized mothers of children with developmental delays and possible ASD.
METHODS: Mothers (N = 27) of children who had a positive autism screen during their 18- or 24-month well-child visit but did not receive an ASD diagnosis after comprehensive developmental evaluation participated in individual semi-structured interviews exploring experiences with developmental screening, related services, and family involvement/social support. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Data were stratified by partner status (i.e., partnered vs. nonpartnered) to examine differences in support and family involvement across varying family compositions.
RESULTS: Three qualitative themes emerged: (1) mothers sought family involvement when making decisions about pursuing developmental evaluations, (2) family involvement affected mothers' navigation of logistical challenges, and (3) mothers involved family members for emotional support. Differences by partner status emerged in themes 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION: Findings highlight benefits of and potential approaches to harnessing family involvement to support parents' navigation of the developmental evaluation process and ultimately improve child outcomes.
METHODS: Mothers (N = 27) of children who had a positive autism screen during their 18- or 24-month well-child visit but did not receive an ASD diagnosis after comprehensive developmental evaluation participated in individual semi-structured interviews exploring experiences with developmental screening, related services, and family involvement/social support. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Data were stratified by partner status (i.e., partnered vs. nonpartnered) to examine differences in support and family involvement across varying family compositions.
RESULTS: Three qualitative themes emerged: (1) mothers sought family involvement when making decisions about pursuing developmental evaluations, (2) family involvement affected mothers' navigation of logistical challenges, and (3) mothers involved family members for emotional support. Differences by partner status emerged in themes 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION: Findings highlight benefits of and potential approaches to harnessing family involvement to support parents' navigation of the developmental evaluation process and ultimately improve child outcomes.