Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2009
An update on advance directives in the medical record: findings from 1186 consecutive patients with unresectable exocrine pancreas cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Tow S, Jatoi Aminah
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Terri Schiavo case and other recent events underscore the importance of advance directives. Yet, in the past, only a small subgroup has utilized them. This study from a large tertiary medical center was undertaken to assess current rates of advance directives among patients with incurable pancreas cancer.
METHODS/RESULTS: The medical records of 1,186 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreas cancer were reviewed over a 4-year span. Only 174 patients (15%) had an advance directive in the medical record. Older age and having cancer therapy at our institution were associated with a greater likelihood of having an advance directive with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 8.26 (2.81, 24.93) and 2.86 (2.03, 4.02), respectively, in multivariate analyses. Importantly, 42 patients (24%) had a different person designated as their healthcare agent in their advanced directive than what appeared in the medical record as the "contact person."
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the ongoing need to discuss advance directives with patients with incurable malignancies and to clarify patients' wishes when seemingly contradictory information appears in other parts of the medical record.
METHODS/RESULTS: The medical records of 1,186 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreas cancer were reviewed over a 4-year span. Only 174 patients (15%) had an advance directive in the medical record. Older age and having cancer therapy at our institution were associated with a greater likelihood of having an advance directive with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 8.26 (2.81, 24.93) and 2.86 (2.03, 4.02), respectively, in multivariate analyses. Importantly, 42 patients (24%) had a different person designated as their healthcare agent in their advanced directive than what appeared in the medical record as the "contact person."
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the ongoing need to discuss advance directives with patients with incurable malignancies and to clarify patients' wishes when seemingly contradictory information appears in other parts of the medical record.