Small bowel angioectasia-The clinical and cost impact of different management strategies.

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with recurrent anaemia and small bowel angioectasia (SBA) is costly and challenging.

AIMS/

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the clinical and cost implication of a combination therapy of Somatostatin analogues (SA) and endoscopic ablation, endoscopic therapy alone, and conservative management.

RESULTS

Median number of bleeding episodes reduced from 3.5 (IQR 4) in the year before, to 1 (IQR 2) in the year after starting combination therapy with SA (p = 0.002). There were no differences in number of bed days (13.7 vs. 15.3, p = 0.66) and cost (£10,835 vs £11,653, p = 0.73) in the year before and after starting combination therapy. There was a trend towards a reduction in median number of blood transfusions episodes (17 vs 5, p = 0.07) and therapeutic endoscopies (1 vs. 0, p = 0.05) after starting SA. In patients suitable for endoscopic therapy alone, time spent in hospital was reduced (-3.5 days, p = 0.004), but bleeding episodes, transfusions and cost of treatment were not different. Patients requiring a combination therapy were significantly more co-morbid with a mean (± sd) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 7.1 (± 2.7). Higher CCI (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.9) and presence of chronic renal failure (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4-12.4) predicted escalation to combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

SAs may be a useful adjunct to endoscopic therapy for transfusion dependent comorbid patients. In the first year they reduce bleeding episodes. Cost in the 1-year before and after adding on SA are no different suggesting additional clinical benefit can be gained without additional cost.