Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026
Comparative Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise versus Resistance Training on Cardiometabolic Health in Patients with Diabesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Mhanna Sameer Badri, Franklin Barry A, Papadakis Zacharias, Phillips Stuart M, Jakicic John M, Stamatakis Emmanuel, Schoenfeld Brad J, Li Yongming, Pescatello Linda S, Riebe Deborah, Thompson Walter R, Yin Mingyue, Alkhamees Nouf H, Sheeha Bodor Bin, Omar Norsuhana, Ibrahim Abubakar, Noh Ain' Sabreena Mohd, Lukman Yusuf, Shah Mohd Shahrulsalam Mohd, Batrakoulis Alexios
Аннотация
To evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise (AE) versus resistance training (RT) on cardiometabolic health-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concurrent obesity (diabesity). Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception up to April 2026. RCTs comparing AE and RT for a minimum duration of two weeks. Participants were adults with diabesity. A total of 23 RCTs qualified, involving 1, 184 patients (58/42 women/men ratio; age range: 30-70 years; body mass index: 32.1 ± 6.6 kg/m2). AE appears to be more efficacious than RT in reducing fasting blood glucose (mean differences (MD) = -0.89 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.16; I2 = 0%) and increasing cardiorespiratory fitness (MD = 1.78 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: 0.38 to 3.18; I2 = 66%). However, AE led to a greater increase in body fat (MD = 0.34%, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.57; I2 = 1%) and less fat-free mass retention (MD = -0.86 kg, 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.26; I2 = 37%) compared with RT. For selected cardiometabolic health-related outcomes, including anthropometrics, blood lipids, and hemodynamics, no statistically significant between-group difference was detected. The overall certainty of the evidence across outcomes ranged from high to very low, with most being moderate. In adults with diabesity, AE appears to provide greater benefits for FBG and CRF, whereas RT appears more favorable for preserving FFM and improving BF. For the majority of cardiometabolic outcomes, the two modalities exhibit analogous effects. The present findings support a goal-directed and complementary approach to exercise prescription, as opposed to a one-modality-fits-all model, for the improvement of cardiometabolic health in patients with diabesity.