MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/gim.0b013e31818050a2

Медицинская библиотека · Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008

Creating genetics-based infusion centers: a case study of two models.

Laney Dawn J, White Amy L, Rhead William J, Fernhoff Paul

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In 1993, the first effective enzyme replacement therapy for a genetic disease, Ceredase (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA), was approved for use in patients with Gaucher disease. Over the next 13 years, enzyme replacement therapy became clinically available for the treatment of Fabry disease, mucopolysaccharidosis Type I, mucopolysaccharidosis Type II, mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI, and glycogen storage disease Type II. The development of enzyme replacement therapy to treat lysosomal storage diseases has resulted in an increasing number of genetic patients undergoing weekly or biweekly intravenous enzyme replacement therapy and an expanded role of the genetics team to include comprehensive care involving therapeutic intervention for lysosomal storage diseases. This article describes the development of two outpatient genetics-based infusion centers: the Northshore Genetics Infusion Clinic as part of the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Lysosomal Diseases Treatment Center in conjunction with the Medical College of Wisconsin and the Emory Lysosomal Storage Disease Center for Genetic Infusions in the Emory University Department of Human Genetics.

Для цитирования: Laney Dawn J, White Amy L, Rhead William J, Fernhoff Paul. Creating genetics-based infusion centers: a case study of two models.. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31818050a2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.