Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Evaluation of Stress Distribution in "All-on-Four" Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Faco Eduardo Francisco de Souza, Amoroso Andressa Paschoal, Pereira Flávia Priscila, Oliveira Luana Ferreira, Sousa Leandro Lécio de Lima, Fabris André Luis da Silva, Garcia Junior Idelmo Rangel, Mazaro José Vitor Quinelli, Filho Osvaldo Magro
Аннотация
The growing demand for implant-supported rehabilitative prosthetic treatments has reinforced the need to optimize biomechanical performance, particularly regarding force distribution. This study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution generated by different configurations of full-arch implant-supported prostheses using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Two mandibular models were created using SolidWorks 2010 (SolidWorks Corp., Waltham, MA, USA) and Rhinoceros® 3D 4.0 (NURBS Modeling for Windows, USA). Each model represented a mandible restored with a full-arch fixed prosthesis supported by external hex implants (4.0 × 13.0 mm; Master, Conexão Sistemas de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) placed in the interforaminal region, differing only in implant angulation. Model 1 included four implants positioned perpendicular to the alveolar ridge, whereas Model 2 represented the All-on-Four configuration with distal implants tilted at 30°. The prosthesis was modeled in acrylic resin with a NiCr metal framework. The geometries were exported to FEMAP 11.0 for mesh generation. Axial loading of 300 N was applied bilaterally (75 N per tooth), and oblique loading of 150 N was applied unilaterally (75 N per tooth) on the first premolars and first molars. Obtained using NEiNastran® 9.2 showed that the tilted-implant model exhibited higher stress concentrations under both loading conditions. The All-on-Four configuration generated the highest stress levels, particularly around the distal implants. The null hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in stress distribution among full-arch implant-supported prostheses supported by straight implants and those rehabilitated according to the All-on-Four concept with tilted distal implants.