Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2020
Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity .
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Foucher Jack R, Gawlik Micha, Roth Julian N, de Crespin de Billy Clément, Jeanjean Ludovic C, Obrecht Alexandre, Mainberger Olivier, Clauss Julie M E, Elowe Julien, Weibel Sébastien, Schorr Benoit, Cetkovich Marcelo, Morra Carlos, Rebok Federico, Ban Thomas A, Bollmann Barbara, Roser Mathilde M, Hanke Markus S, Jabs Burkhard E, Franzek Ernst J, Berna Fabrice, Pfuhlmann Bruno
Аннотация
While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion.
.