MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000000431

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2017

UNILATERAL BEST DISEASE: A CASE REPORT.

Kaden Talia R, Tan Anna C S, Feiner Leonard, Freund K Bailey

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the multimodal imaging findings observed unilaterally in a patient with Best disease due to a p.G15D mutation in the BEST1 gene.

METHODS

The clinical history of a 62-year-old female patient with unilateral Best disease was reviewed. Retinal findings were documented by clinical examination and multimodal imaging.

RESULTS

Posterior segment examination of the patient's right eye demonstrated retinal pigment epithelium hypopigmentation and clumping in the central macula beneath a chronic shallow serous retinal detachment (SRD), confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Fluorescein angiography showed central staining with no evidence of focal leakage or choroidal neovascularization, and correlated with the hypoautofluorescence seen on fundus autofluorescence. There was no evidence of choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography, nor was there any neovascularization detected on optical coherence tomography-angiography. The left eye appeared normal with all imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION

Best disease is an autosomal dominant disease that is generally bilateral. We present a case of a unilateral Best disease with serous retinal detachment in a patient with a p.G15D mutation in BEST1. Best disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of serous retinal detachment and may masquerade as central serous chorioretinopathy.

Для цитирования: Kaden Talia R, Tan Anna C S, Feiner Leonard, Freund K Bailey. UNILATERAL BEST DISEASE: A CASE REPORT.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000000431.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.