JMIR research protocols · 2025
Activity-Based Interventions to Increase Independence After Stroke In the Hospital Setting: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grant Tayla, Jolliffe Laura, Wales Kylie, Schneider Emma, Drummond Avril E, Lannin Natasha A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of disability, commonly resulting in difficulty completing basic and instrumental activities of daily living. Rehabilitation is recommended to improve functional performance; however, it remains unknown whether early (hospital-based) intervention is effective; nor is it known what intervention components should be delivered.
OBJECTIVE: We propose a systematic review to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of activity-based interventions, led by occupational therapists, for improving performance of basic activities of daily living (b-ADL) or simple cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL) among adults with stroke. Reviewing simple C-IADLs as opposed to instrumental activities of daily living will allow us to review interventions for activities with similar executive functioning demands. By identifying effective interventions, we aim to improve outcomes for stroke survivors by maximizing independence during hospitalization.
METHODS: Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials that include adult stroke survivors and tested interventions (delivered in the hospital setting) aiming to improve or promote independence in b-ADLs or C-IADLs. Two reviewers will independently screen full-text articles, and one reviewer will extract data, with a second reviewer providing confirmation. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of studies. The Cochrane Q test will assess heterogeneity among studies, and where appropriate, meta-analysis will then be performed. Measures of outcomes may include global ratings of function (such as the Functional Independence Measure) or specific task performance assessments (such as the Nottingham Dressing Assessment).
RESULTS: Results will be presented based on subgroup analyses where possible, including activity type (activity or occupation level), time after stroke (within or after 1 week), and delivery of intervention (group or individualized).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will address the current gap in the literature regarding activity-based interventions for stroke survivors in the inpatient setting and provide clinical guidance on the most effective methods, if any, for improving independence early after stroke.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024562195; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024562195.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/73133.
OBJECTIVE: We propose a systematic review to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of activity-based interventions, led by occupational therapists, for improving performance of basic activities of daily living (b-ADL) or simple cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL) among adults with stroke. Reviewing simple C-IADLs as opposed to instrumental activities of daily living will allow us to review interventions for activities with similar executive functioning demands. By identifying effective interventions, we aim to improve outcomes for stroke survivors by maximizing independence during hospitalization.
METHODS: Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials that include adult stroke survivors and tested interventions (delivered in the hospital setting) aiming to improve or promote independence in b-ADLs or C-IADLs. Two reviewers will independently screen full-text articles, and one reviewer will extract data, with a second reviewer providing confirmation. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of studies. The Cochrane Q test will assess heterogeneity among studies, and where appropriate, meta-analysis will then be performed. Measures of outcomes may include global ratings of function (such as the Functional Independence Measure) or specific task performance assessments (such as the Nottingham Dressing Assessment).
RESULTS: Results will be presented based on subgroup analyses where possible, including activity type (activity or occupation level), time after stroke (within or after 1 week), and delivery of intervention (group or individualized).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review will address the current gap in the literature regarding activity-based interventions for stroke survivors in the inpatient setting and provide clinical guidance on the most effective methods, if any, for improving independence early after stroke.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024562195; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024562195.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/73133.