Activity-Based Interventions to Increase Independence After Stroke In the Hospital Setting: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of disability, commonly resulting in difficulty completing basic and instrumental activities of daily living. Rehabilitation is recommended to improve functional performance; however, it remains unknown whether early (hospital-based) intervention is effective; nor is it known what intervention components should be delivered.

OBJECTIVE

We propose a systematic review to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of activity-based interventions, led by occupational therapists, for improving performance of basic activities of daily living (b-ADL) or simple cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL) among adults with stroke. Reviewing simple C-IADLs as opposed to instrumental activities of daily living will allow us to review interventions for activities with similar executive functioning demands. By identifying effective interventions, we aim to improve outcomes for stroke survivors by maximizing independence during hospitalization.

METHODS

Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials that include adult stroke survivors and tested interventions (delivered in the hospital setting) aiming to improve or promote independence in b-ADLs or C-IADLs. Two reviewers will independently screen full-text articles, and one reviewer will extract data, with a second reviewer providing confirmation. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of studies. The Cochrane Q test will assess heterogeneity among studies, and where appropriate, meta-analysis will then be performed. Measures of outcomes may include global ratings of function (such as the Functional Independence Measure) or specific task performance assessments (such as the Nottingham Dressing Assessment).

RESULTS

Results will be presented based on subgroup analyses where possible, including activity type (activity or occupation level), time after stroke (within or after 1 week), and delivery of intervention (group or individualized).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review will address the current gap in the literature regarding activity-based interventions for stroke survivors in the inpatient setting and provide clinical guidance on the most effective methods, if any, for improving independence early after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024562195; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024562195.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/73133.