BJU international · 1999
The Mitrofanoff urinary diversion for complex vesicovaginal fistulae: experience from Uganda.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hodges A M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of Mitrofanoff continent urinary diversion in a group of women with persistent severe incontinence after vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) secondary to obstructed labour.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven women with severe incontinence following a VVF were offered the Mitrofanoff procedure after all other attempts had failed to restore continence. In three patients a caecocystoplasty formed the urinary reservoir and in four the bladder was used. In all seven patients the appendix was used as the conduit for self-catheterization. The mean (range) follow-up was 10 (3-14) months.
RESULTS: One patient died postoperatively from hepatic failure, which could not be attributed to the particular procedure. One patient required re-operation at 10 days to adjust the conduit, but of the six patients who recovered, all are fully continent and self-catheterizing with no difficulty.
CONCLUSION: The Mitrofanoff procedure appears to be a valuable technique to restore continence in this difficult group of patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven women with severe incontinence following a VVF were offered the Mitrofanoff procedure after all other attempts had failed to restore continence. In three patients a caecocystoplasty formed the urinary reservoir and in four the bladder was used. In all seven patients the appendix was used as the conduit for self-catheterization. The mean (range) follow-up was 10 (3-14) months.
RESULTS: One patient died postoperatively from hepatic failure, which could not be attributed to the particular procedure. One patient required re-operation at 10 days to adjust the conduit, but of the six patients who recovered, all are fully continent and self-catheterizing with no difficulty.
CONCLUSION: The Mitrofanoff procedure appears to be a valuable technique to restore continence in this difficult group of patients.