MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cod.12320

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2014

Are gloves sufficiently protective when hairdressers are exposed to permanent hair dyes? An in vivo study.

Antelmi Annarita, Young Ewa, Svedman Cecilia, Zimerson Erik, Engfeldt Malin, Foti Caterina, Bruze Magnus

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The use of permanent hair dyes exposes hairdressers to contact allergens such as p-phenylenediamine (PPD), and the preventive measures are insufficient.

OBJECTIVES

To perform an in vivo test to study the protective effect of gloves commonly used by hairdressers.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS/

METHODS

Six gloves from Sweden, Italy and Germany were studied: two vinyl, one natural rubber latex, two nitrile, and one polyethylene. The hair dye used for the provocation was a dark shade permanent dye containing PPD. The dye was mixed with hydrogen peroxide, and 8 PPD-sensitized volunteers were tested with the gloves as a membrane between the hair dye and the skin in a cylindrical open chamber system. Three exposure times (15, 30 and 60 min) were used.

RESULTS

Eczematous reactions were found when natural rubber latex, polyethylene and vinyl gloves were tested with the dye. The nitrile gloves gave good protection, even after 60 min of exposure to the hair dye.

CONCLUSIONS

Many protective gloves used by hairdressers are unsuitable for protection against the risk of elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis caused by PPD.

Для цитирования: Antelmi Annarita, Young Ewa, Svedman Cecilia, Zimerson Erik, Engfeldt Malin, Foti Caterina, Bruze Magnus. Are gloves sufficiently protective when hairdressers are exposed to permanent hair dyes? An in vivo study.. Contact dermatitis. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/cod.12320.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.