MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0300060519851354

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2019

Ultrasonic assessment of carotid intima-media thickness in migraine: a meta-analysis.

Wang Qiao, Liu Zhen-Yu, Zhou Jia

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Migraine is believed to be a risk factor for cerebrovascular diseases, and previous studies have indicated an association between migraine and cerebral atherosclerosis. Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) is considered to be a biomarker of atherosclerosis pathology. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between carotid IMT and migraine by conducting a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies assessing carotid IMT in patients with migraine and controls. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included seven articles with 555 subjects (279 migraine patients, 276 controls). Carotid IMT was significantly greater in patients with migraine compared with controls. However, there were no significant differences in IMT between patients with migraine with aura (MA) and controls, migraine without aura (MO) and controls, and patients with MA and MO.

CONCLUSION

Patients with migraine have greater carotid IMT than individuals without migraine, suggesting an association between atherosclerosis and migraine. However, further studies with more samples are needed to confirm this finding.

Для цитирования: Wang Qiao, Liu Zhen-Yu, Zhou Jia. Ultrasonic assessment of carotid intima-media thickness in migraine: a meta-analysis.. The Journal of international medical research. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0300060519851354.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.