Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2026
Factors Associated with Consent and Opportunities to Increase Participation in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry: A Population-Based Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guidea Michael, Mac-Thiong Jean-Marc, Hong Heather A, Dionne Antoine, Kurban Dilnur, Xu Jijie, Humphreys Suzanne, Cheng Christiana L, Fallah Nader, Barthelemy Dorothy, Christie Sean D, Fourney Daryl, Linassi A Gary, Loyola-Sanchez Adalberto, Paquet Jerome, Sreenivasan Vidya A, Townson Andrea, Tsai Eve C, Noonan Vanessa K, Richard-Denis Andréane, RHSCIR Network
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Disease-specific registries that record patient data are crucial in supporting research, guiding best practices, and optimizing resource allocation. Since 2004, the Canadian Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) has collected data from over 10,000 individuals with SCI.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify factors associated with consenting to RHSCIR and reasons for withdrawal to improve registry inclusivity and representativeness in persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 4090 participants enrolled at RHSCIR acute facilities from 2009 to 2019. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: declined consent (DC), provided full consent (FC), or provided minimal consent and/or later withdrew consent (MWC). Due to the lack of available data for the DC group, descriptive and multivariable analyses focused on the FC and MWC groups to identify factors associated with full consent.
RESULTS: Of 4090 participants, 2998 (73.3%) were FC, and 856 (20.9%) were MWC. After adjusting for significant differences between the groups, older age and an absence of comorbidities were associated with a decreased likelihood of providing FC. Individuals living in the Atlantic provinces and Ontario showed a higher likelihood of FC than those in the Prairies. The primary reason for withdrawing was a lack of interest.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with participation and suggests strategies to increase recruitment and inclusivity in RHSCIR. By understanding registry participation, public health policies can be informed, resource allocation optimized, and patient care enhanced for individuals with TSCI.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify factors associated with consenting to RHSCIR and reasons for withdrawal to improve registry inclusivity and representativeness in persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 4090 participants enrolled at RHSCIR acute facilities from 2009 to 2019. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: declined consent (DC), provided full consent (FC), or provided minimal consent and/or later withdrew consent (MWC). Due to the lack of available data for the DC group, descriptive and multivariable analyses focused on the FC and MWC groups to identify factors associated with full consent.
RESULTS: Of 4090 participants, 2998 (73.3%) were FC, and 856 (20.9%) were MWC. After adjusting for significant differences between the groups, older age and an absence of comorbidities were associated with a decreased likelihood of providing FC. Individuals living in the Atlantic provinces and Ontario showed a higher likelihood of FC than those in the Prairies. The primary reason for withdrawing was a lack of interest.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with participation and suggests strategies to increase recruitment and inclusivity in RHSCIR. By understanding registry participation, public health policies can be informed, resource allocation optimized, and patient care enhanced for individuals with TSCI.