Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sotelo René, Sayegh Aref S, Medina Luis G, Perez Laura C, La Riva Anibal, Eppler Michael B, Gaona José, Tobias-Machado Marcos, Spiess Philippe E, Pettaway Curtis A, Lima Pompeo Antonio Carlos, Lima Mattos Pablo Aloisio, Wilson Timothy G, Villoldo Gustavo M, Chung Eric, Samaniego Aldo, Ornellas Antonio Augusto, Pinheiro Vladimir, Brazão Eder S, Subira-Rios David, Koifman Leandro, Zequi Stênio de Cassio, Pontillo Z Humberto M, Rodrigues Calixto José de Ribamar, Campos Silva Rafael, Smithers B Mark, Garzon Simone, Haase Oliver, Sommariva Antonio, Fruscio Robert, Martins Francisco, de Oliveira Pedro S, Levi Sandri Giovanni Battista, Clementi Marco, Astigueta Juan, Metwally Islam H, Bharathan Rasiah, Jindal Tarun, Nakamura Yasuhiro, Abdel Mageed Hisham, Jeevarajan Sakthiushadevi, Rodriguez Lay Ramón, García-Perdomo Herney Andrés, Rodríguez González Omaira, Ghodoussipour Saum, Gill Inderbir, Cacciamani Giovanni E
Аннотация
METHODS: A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.
RESULTS: Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.
CONCLUSION: The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.