Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
The application value and limitations of metagenomic detection technology based on cerebrospinal fluid samples in suspected central nervous system infection: a retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feng Qiujuan, Liu Baoyi, Liu Huazhao, Fan Yaqin, Gao Shanshan, Zhang Jia, Kuang Yingjie, Wang Wenshan, Liang Huiqiang, Qiu Yulan, Wen Huamei, Feng Zize, Huang Yanming, Zuo Wanli, Zhang Xin, Zeng Jincheng, Wu Jinhua, Liang Yuanhao, Gu Jiyong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurately diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) infections remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing suspected CNS infections and its role in facilitating rapid and accurate pathogen identification.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 246 patients with suspected CNS infections and 20 controls with definitively ruled-out infections. Using clinical diagnoses established by an expert panel based on comprehensive criteria as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of mNGS relative to culture and conventional tests. Additionally, we analyzed the therapeutic guidance value of positive mNGS results and risk factors for false negatives.
RESULTS: mNGS showed 73.2% (180/246) agreement with clinical diagnosis, superior to culture (54.1%, 133/246) and conventional methods (61.4%, 151/246). For general bacteria and fungi, mNGS showed 61.9% (26/42) concordance with culture. False negatives in mNGS predominantly involved viral missed detection. Age, presence of systemic infection, headache, and cerebrospinal fluid glucose levels were likely key determinants of mNGS performance. mNGS detection of Epstein-Barr virus, Streptococcus spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, herpes simplex virus type 1, and Staphylococcus spp. suggested high pathogenic potential, whereas Torque teno virus detection more likely indicated carriage or experimental contamination.
CONCLUSION: mNGS holds significant value for the diagnosis, therapeutic management, and prognostic assessment of suspected CNS infections.
METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 246 patients with suspected CNS infections and 20 controls with definitively ruled-out infections. Using clinical diagnoses established by an expert panel based on comprehensive criteria as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of mNGS relative to culture and conventional tests. Additionally, we analyzed the therapeutic guidance value of positive mNGS results and risk factors for false negatives.
RESULTS: mNGS showed 73.2% (180/246) agreement with clinical diagnosis, superior to culture (54.1%, 133/246) and conventional methods (61.4%, 151/246). For general bacteria and fungi, mNGS showed 61.9% (26/42) concordance with culture. False negatives in mNGS predominantly involved viral missed detection. Age, presence of systemic infection, headache, and cerebrospinal fluid glucose levels were likely key determinants of mNGS performance. mNGS detection of Epstein-Barr virus, Streptococcus spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, herpes simplex virus type 1, and Staphylococcus spp. suggested high pathogenic potential, whereas Torque teno virus detection more likely indicated carriage or experimental contamination.
CONCLUSION: mNGS holds significant value for the diagnosis, therapeutic management, and prognostic assessment of suspected CNS infections.