Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
Evaluating the cognitive efficacy of marine-derived drugs in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Zhaoming, Xie Yun, Zhu Hanmo, Li Jian, Yang Chen, Guo Yanao, Nong Xun, Zhu Zhanchi, Chen Zhouqing, Wang Zhong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In recent years, marine-derived drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have attracted growing attention, but their comparative cognitive efficacy and safety remain uncertain because of inconsistent findings across studies.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of marine-derived interventions for Alzheimer's disease.
DESIGN: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of marine-derived drugs in patients with AD. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MD) in change-from-baseline, and dichotomous outcomes were synthesized as odds ratios (OR), each with 95% credible intervals (CI).
RESULTS: A total of 16 eligible RCTs involving 4,158 patients were included. For the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), GV-971 (vs placebo; MD -1.85, 95% CI -2.89 to -0.82) and tramiprosate (vs placebo; MD -0.83, 95% CI -1.63 to -0.02) significantly improved cognitive function. For the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), rifampicin (vs placebo; MD 1.90, 95% CI 0.25 to 3.56) was associated with greater improvement in MMSE scores, whereas tramiprosate (vs placebo; MD -2.40, 95% CI -4.67 to -0.09) was associated with poorer cognitive performance. No statistically significant differences among drugs were observed for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) or for the incidence of adverse events. Overall, treatment effects were outcome-dependent, with significant benefits observed mainly in ADAS-Cog and MMSE, whereas no intervention demonstrated consistent superiority across all cognitive outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Marine-derived drugs showed generally acceptable safety and potential cognitive benefits in selected outcomes. GV-971 and tramiprosate improved ADAS-Cog scores, while rifampicin therapy showed a possible MMSE benefit. However, no intervention was consistently superior across cognitive outcomes, and the antibiotic finding was based on a single small trial. Current evidence is therefore insufficient to identify the optimal marine-derived therapy for AD, highlighting the need for larger, adequately powered RCTs.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of marine-derived interventions for Alzheimer's disease.
DESIGN: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of marine-derived drugs in patients with AD. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MD) in change-from-baseline, and dichotomous outcomes were synthesized as odds ratios (OR), each with 95% credible intervals (CI).
RESULTS: A total of 16 eligible RCTs involving 4,158 patients were included. For the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), GV-971 (vs placebo; MD -1.85, 95% CI -2.89 to -0.82) and tramiprosate (vs placebo; MD -0.83, 95% CI -1.63 to -0.02) significantly improved cognitive function. For the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), rifampicin (vs placebo; MD 1.90, 95% CI 0.25 to 3.56) was associated with greater improvement in MMSE scores, whereas tramiprosate (vs placebo; MD -2.40, 95% CI -4.67 to -0.09) was associated with poorer cognitive performance. No statistically significant differences among drugs were observed for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) or for the incidence of adverse events. Overall, treatment effects were outcome-dependent, with significant benefits observed mainly in ADAS-Cog and MMSE, whereas no intervention demonstrated consistent superiority across all cognitive outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Marine-derived drugs showed generally acceptable safety and potential cognitive benefits in selected outcomes. GV-971 and tramiprosate improved ADAS-Cog scores, while rifampicin therapy showed a possible MMSE benefit. However, no intervention was consistently superior across cognitive outcomes, and the antibiotic finding was based on a single small trial. Current evidence is therefore insufficient to identify the optimal marine-derived therapy for AD, highlighting the need for larger, adequately powered RCTs.