Open heart · 2026
Clinical outcomes of pulsed field versus radiofrequency ablation, incorporating posterior wall isolation, in persistent atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ahmed Omar, Li Anthony, Zazai Ibrahim, Bajpai Abhay, Zuberi Zia, Norman Mark, Leung Lisa, Specterman Mark James, Sohal Manav, Behr Elijah R, Saba Magdi, Kaba Riyaz A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging to treat with catheter ablation. The left atrial posterior wall (PW) may represent an important non-pulmonary vein (PV) substrate; however, randomised trials have not demonstrated improved outcomes with adjunctive PW isolation (PWI), potentially reflecting technical limitations of thermal ablation rather than a lack of mechanistic relevance. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablation modality that selectively targets myocardial tissue and may enable safer and more consistent PWI. We compared real-world outcomes of PFA and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for combined PV isolation and PWI in patients with persistent AF.
METHODS: 200 consecutive patients (100 PFA and 100 RFA) undergoing combined PVI and PWI were retrospectively followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics were broadly similar; however, PFA patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (43.5% (35.5-55.5%) vs 47% (40-58), p=0.01) and higher CHA₂DS₂-VA risk score (3 (2-4) vs 2 (1-3), p=0.01). Primary outcomes were acute procedural success and freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: PFA achieved near-universal PWI compared with RFA (99% vs RFA: 65%, p<0.005), with shorter procedure duration (106 vs 143.5 min, p<0.005), reduced left atrial dwell time (62 vs 98 min, p<0.005), and faster time to PVI and PWI (all p<0.005). Major non-vascular complications were uncommon (1.5%) and similar between groups. At 12 months, freedom from recurrent AT was higher with PFA (70% vs RFA 54%, p=0.03), with lower odds of first detected AT recurrence in adjusted time-to-event analysis (OR 0.46 (0.26-0.82), p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, PFA was associated with a higher rate of acute PWI and greater freedom from AT compared with RFA, without a signal of increased complications. Prospective randomised studies are needed to define the role of PWI delivered with PFA in patients with persistent AF, including those with reduced LVEF.
METHODS: 200 consecutive patients (100 PFA and 100 RFA) undergoing combined PVI and PWI were retrospectively followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics were broadly similar; however, PFA patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (43.5% (35.5-55.5%) vs 47% (40-58), p=0.01) and higher CHA₂DS₂-VA risk score (3 (2-4) vs 2 (1-3), p=0.01). Primary outcomes were acute procedural success and freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: PFA achieved near-universal PWI compared with RFA (99% vs RFA: 65%, p<0.005), with shorter procedure duration (106 vs 143.5 min, p<0.005), reduced left atrial dwell time (62 vs 98 min, p<0.005), and faster time to PVI and PWI (all p<0.005). Major non-vascular complications were uncommon (1.5%) and similar between groups. At 12 months, freedom from recurrent AT was higher with PFA (70% vs RFA 54%, p=0.03), with lower odds of first detected AT recurrence in adjusted time-to-event analysis (OR 0.46 (0.26-0.82), p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, PFA was associated with a higher rate of acute PWI and greater freedom from AT compared with RFA, without a signal of increased complications. Prospective randomised studies are needed to define the role of PWI delivered with PFA in patients with persistent AF, including those with reduced LVEF.