Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko · 2020
[Comparative analysis of mono- and bipolar pyramidal tract mapping in patients with supratentorial tumors adjacent to motor areas: comparison of data at 64 stimulation points].
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kosyrkova A V, Goryainov S A, Ogurtsova A A, Okhlopkov V A, Kravchuk A D, Batalov A I, Afandiev R M, Bayev A A, Pogosbekyan E L, Pronin I N, Zakharova N E, Danilov G V, Strunina Yu V, Potapov A A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare monopolar and bipolar mapping in point-by-point fashion by using of threshold amperage, frequency of positive motor responses and the number of muscles involved in response.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study included 14 patients with supratentorial tumors who underwent surgery in 2018-2019. All neoplasms were localized within 2 cm from the motor cortex and pyramidal tract. Age of patients ranged from 25 to 74 years. There were 9 women and 5 men. Eight patients had malignant glioma (grade III - 4, grade IV - 4), 6 patients - meningioma. Motor functions were assessed in all patients before and after surgery (1, 7 days and 3 months later) by using of a 5-point scale. In addition to routine neurophysiological monitoring, comparative mono- and bipolar mapping of the pyramidal tract within the bed of excised tumor was carried out at the end of surgery. The points of motor responses were marked. Comparative analysis of mono- and bipolar stimulation at identical points included threshold amperage, frequency of positive motor responses and the number of muscles involved in response (leg, forearm, hand, facial muscles). Brain MRI was performed in early postoperative period for assessment of resection quality.
RESULTS: There were 64 points of motor responses in 14 patients. The number of these points ranged from 2 to 8 per a patient (mean 5 points). Motor responses were recorded in 57 points during monopolar and bipolar stimulation, in other 7 points - only during monopolar stimulation. Amperage of monopolar stimulation was 3-15 mA, bipolar stimulation - 2.5-25 mA. Threshold amperage (7.37 mA for monopolar stimulation and 8.88 mA for bipolar stimulation; p=0.12), frequency of positive motor responses and the number of muscles involved in response (p=0.1 and p=0.73) were similar. Seven (50%) patients had neurological deterioration in early postoperative period (4 patients with glial tumors and 3 patients with meningiomas). At the same time, only 2 patients (14.3%) had persistent neurological deficit (both patients with infiltrative meningioma). According to postoperative MRI in T1+C mode, resection volume was 100% in 1 patient with contrast-enhanced glioma and 94% in another one. According to FLAIR MRI data, resection volume exceeded 70% in 2 patients with non-enhancing glioma and less than 70% in 2 patients. Meningioma resection volume was estimated according to postoperative T1+C MRI data and made up over 90% in 4 patients.
CONCLUSION: Monopolar stimulation is a reliable method of pyramidal tract identification in supratentorial brain tumor surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study included 14 patients with supratentorial tumors who underwent surgery in 2018-2019. All neoplasms were localized within 2 cm from the motor cortex and pyramidal tract. Age of patients ranged from 25 to 74 years. There were 9 women and 5 men. Eight patients had malignant glioma (grade III - 4, grade IV - 4), 6 patients - meningioma. Motor functions were assessed in all patients before and after surgery (1, 7 days and 3 months later) by using of a 5-point scale. In addition to routine neurophysiological monitoring, comparative mono- and bipolar mapping of the pyramidal tract within the bed of excised tumor was carried out at the end of surgery. The points of motor responses were marked. Comparative analysis of mono- and bipolar stimulation at identical points included threshold amperage, frequency of positive motor responses and the number of muscles involved in response (leg, forearm, hand, facial muscles). Brain MRI was performed in early postoperative period for assessment of resection quality.
RESULTS: There were 64 points of motor responses in 14 patients. The number of these points ranged from 2 to 8 per a patient (mean 5 points). Motor responses were recorded in 57 points during monopolar and bipolar stimulation, in other 7 points - only during monopolar stimulation. Amperage of monopolar stimulation was 3-15 mA, bipolar stimulation - 2.5-25 mA. Threshold amperage (7.37 mA for monopolar stimulation and 8.88 mA for bipolar stimulation; p=0.12), frequency of positive motor responses and the number of muscles involved in response (p=0.1 and p=0.73) were similar. Seven (50%) patients had neurological deterioration in early postoperative period (4 patients with glial tumors and 3 patients with meningiomas). At the same time, only 2 patients (14.3%) had persistent neurological deficit (both patients with infiltrative meningioma). According to postoperative MRI in T1+C mode, resection volume was 100% in 1 patient with contrast-enhanced glioma and 94% in another one. According to FLAIR MRI data, resection volume exceeded 70% in 2 patients with non-enhancing glioma and less than 70% in 2 patients. Meningioma resection volume was estimated according to postoperative T1+C MRI data and made up over 90% in 4 patients.
CONCLUSION: Monopolar stimulation is a reliable method of pyramidal tract identification in supratentorial brain tumor surgery.