Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
Clinical Evaluation of Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging for the Detection of Intramammary Micro- and Macrocalcifications in 70 Female Patients at 1.5T.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lebenatus Annett, Tesch Karolin, Straub Sina, Strathmann Eike Andreas, Bautz Lana, Schäfer Karl Fritz Werner, Bauerschlag Dirk Olaf, Jansen Olav, Salehi Ravesh Mona
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The ability to accurately detect and characterize intramammary micro- and macrocalcifications without ionized radiation has significant clinical implications for early breast cancer assessment. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of detecting intramammary calcifications using 3D multi-echo gradient echo (ME-GRE) magnitude and true susceptibility-weighted images (tSWI) compared to digital mammography (DM) in patients with different breast sizes and densities of breast parenchyma at 1.5T.
METHODS: Two board-certified radiologists evaluated digital mammograms of 70 patients and compared them to the corresponding SW-based images concerning detection of intramammary calcifications and determination of their sizes. The clinical performance of both SW-based techniques in accurately detecting and assessing intramammary calcifications was determined. In addition an interobserver agreement was performed.
RESULTS: Compared to DM, visualization of calcification lesions using both SW-based techniques is influenced by: 1) Morphology (shape and homogeneity) of calcifications; 2) Spatial arrangement of calcifications. Closely adjacent calcifications may not be distinguishable in the SW-based images as individual lesions. Overlapping susceptibility effects resulted in a single, larger lesion; 3) The (in-phase or out-of-phase cycle) echo time value selected in the imaging protocol plays a crucial role in visualizing the lesions; and 4) Lesion size was overestimated by up to 2.0 mm when comparing SW-based techniques to DM. An almost perfect interobserver agreement was found for the analysis. Microcalcifications could not be visualized. A sensitivity of 13.0% and specificity of 99.7% for the diagnosis of macrocalcifications could be provided with both SW-based techniques.
CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the potentials and limitations of SW-based techniques at 1.5 T for characterizing intramammary micro- and macrocalcifications. The high specificity of SW-based techniques in combination with higher magnetic field strengths could revolutionize breast cancer screening and management.
METHODS: Two board-certified radiologists evaluated digital mammograms of 70 patients and compared them to the corresponding SW-based images concerning detection of intramammary calcifications and determination of their sizes. The clinical performance of both SW-based techniques in accurately detecting and assessing intramammary calcifications was determined. In addition an interobserver agreement was performed.
RESULTS: Compared to DM, visualization of calcification lesions using both SW-based techniques is influenced by: 1) Morphology (shape and homogeneity) of calcifications; 2) Spatial arrangement of calcifications. Closely adjacent calcifications may not be distinguishable in the SW-based images as individual lesions. Overlapping susceptibility effects resulted in a single, larger lesion; 3) The (in-phase or out-of-phase cycle) echo time value selected in the imaging protocol plays a crucial role in visualizing the lesions; and 4) Lesion size was overestimated by up to 2.0 mm when comparing SW-based techniques to DM. An almost perfect interobserver agreement was found for the analysis. Microcalcifications could not be visualized. A sensitivity of 13.0% and specificity of 99.7% for the diagnosis of macrocalcifications could be provided with both SW-based techniques.
CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the potentials and limitations of SW-based techniques at 1.5 T for characterizing intramammary micro- and macrocalcifications. The high specificity of SW-based techniques in combination with higher magnetic field strengths could revolutionize breast cancer screening and management.