BMC medical imaging · 2025
Improvement in matching lesions in dual-view mammograms using a geometric model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Sina, Xu Zeyuan, Zheng Bowen, Zeng Hui, Pan Derun, Ma Mengwei, Chen Weiguo, Qin Genggeng
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a geometric model (GM) as an adjunctive tool for radiologists to match lesions between craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral (MLO) views.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 711 patients who underwent mammography from January 2016 to August 2018. Two senior radiologists used bounding boxes to delineate lesions as the reference standard, calculated the absolute error (the shortest distance from the lesion center to the predicted curve) of GM, and compared it with the annular band (AB) and straight strip (SS) methods. Four radiologists of varying seniority levels were tasked with localizing the corresponding lesion in MLO view using a bounding box, based on the given lesion in CC views, and recording reading time per case with or without GM assistance. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the overlap between the bounding box and the reference standard.
RESULTS: Overall, 499 calcification and 212 mass pairs were evaluated. GM outperformed both AB and SS, yielding a median absolute error of 3.03 mm (IQR 1.45-5.55 mm) versus 5.78 mm (IQR 2.44-10.71 mm) for AB and 4.59 mm (IQR 1.91-8.19 mm) for SS (P < 0.001). With GM assistance, all four radiologists achieved improved Dice coefficients and reduced reading times (all P < 0.001). Stratified analysis by lesion conspicuity demonstrated that GM assistance significantly enhanced Dice coefficients for all radiologists in the low-conspicuity group and improved matching consistency for junior radiologists.
CONCLUSION: The geometric model holds substantial promise as a valuable tool to assist radiologists in more effectively localizing lesions in ipsilateral mammograms, thereby potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 711 patients who underwent mammography from January 2016 to August 2018. Two senior radiologists used bounding boxes to delineate lesions as the reference standard, calculated the absolute error (the shortest distance from the lesion center to the predicted curve) of GM, and compared it with the annular band (AB) and straight strip (SS) methods. Four radiologists of varying seniority levels were tasked with localizing the corresponding lesion in MLO view using a bounding box, based on the given lesion in CC views, and recording reading time per case with or without GM assistance. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the overlap between the bounding box and the reference standard.
RESULTS: Overall, 499 calcification and 212 mass pairs were evaluated. GM outperformed both AB and SS, yielding a median absolute error of 3.03 mm (IQR 1.45-5.55 mm) versus 5.78 mm (IQR 2.44-10.71 mm) for AB and 4.59 mm (IQR 1.91-8.19 mm) for SS (P < 0.001). With GM assistance, all four radiologists achieved improved Dice coefficients and reduced reading times (all P < 0.001). Stratified analysis by lesion conspicuity demonstrated that GM assistance significantly enhanced Dice coefficients for all radiologists in the low-conspicuity group and improved matching consistency for junior radiologists.
CONCLUSION: The geometric model holds substantial promise as a valuable tool to assist radiologists in more effectively localizing lesions in ipsilateral mammograms, thereby potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.