Surgical neurology international · 2024
A technique for reconstruction of a giant extracranial internal carotid artery aneurysm: A technical note.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hashio Atsushi, Sato Hiroki, Lepić Milan, Suzuki Kaima, Satoh Tsugumi, Nemoto Shin, Kuribara Seiji, Ito Yuhei, Suzuki Shun, Lee Ichi, Teranishi Akio, Yanagawa Taro, Ikeda Toshiki, Ooigawa Hidetoshi, Kurita Hiroki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Surgery is effective for extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) aneurysms. However, the risk of cranial nerve injury associated with surgical repair, such as graft-assisted resection and extracranial-intracranial bypass techniques, is relatively high. Here, we report two cases of surgical treatment for EICA aneurysms and describe the surgical techniques and strategies to avoid cranial nerve injury.
METHODS: Two patients presented to our facility with an increasing cervical pulsatile mass and no neurological symptoms. Angiography showed a large aneurysm in the cervical internal carotid artery. Surgical treatment was performed to prevent rupture of the aneurysm. In both patients, the aneurysm was strongly attached to the vagus nerve. The aneurysm and vagus nerve were carefully dissected using a low-power bipolar (20 Malis; 3 watts), leaving connective tissue on the vagus nerve side.
RESULTS: The aneurysm was detached from the vagus nerve without injury. Based on intraoperative findings, one patient underwent clipping, and the other underwent aneurysmectomy and primary closure for aneurysm obliteration and angioplasty. Both patients were discharged without any cranial nerve dysfunction.
CONCLUSION: The selection of a strategy based on intraoperative findings and low-power bipolar cutting is important for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms to preserve cranial nerves.
METHODS: Two patients presented to our facility with an increasing cervical pulsatile mass and no neurological symptoms. Angiography showed a large aneurysm in the cervical internal carotid artery. Surgical treatment was performed to prevent rupture of the aneurysm. In both patients, the aneurysm was strongly attached to the vagus nerve. The aneurysm and vagus nerve were carefully dissected using a low-power bipolar (20 Malis; 3 watts), leaving connective tissue on the vagus nerve side.
RESULTS: The aneurysm was detached from the vagus nerve without injury. Based on intraoperative findings, one patient underwent clipping, and the other underwent aneurysmectomy and primary closure for aneurysm obliteration and angioplasty. Both patients were discharged without any cranial nerve dysfunction.
CONCLUSION: The selection of a strategy based on intraoperative findings and low-power bipolar cutting is important for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms to preserve cranial nerves.