DOI 10.1007/s10006-025-01398-4
Assessment of the prevalence of nasal deviation in patients requiring orthognathic surgery: association with maxillary, mandibular, or chin asymmetry.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Identifying nasal deviation in patients requiring orthognathic surgery is critical for developing an accurate treatment plan, particularly in the axial plane. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and degree of nasal and septal deviation in patients requiring orthognathic surgery, and to assess their relationship with maxillary, mandibular, and chin asymmetries, as well as dento-skeletal class.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted on patients who required orthognathic surgery between July 2020 and February 2021. Exclusion criteria included congenital craniofacial anomalies, history of mandibular condylar hyperplasia, or prior rhino-septoplasty procedures.
RESULTS
Of the 103 patients studied, 97.1% exhibited some degree of nasal deviation, and all presented with septal deviation. Nasal septum deviation correlated significantly with nasal tip deviation (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) and dorsum deviation (r = 0.41, p < 0.001). A combination of nasal, maxillary, mandibular, and chin deviations was present in 77.3%, 83.5%, and 88.3% of patients, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the directions of maxillary (r = 0.21, p = 0.032), mandibular (r = 0.25, p = 0.012), and chin deviations (r = 0.19, p = 0.050).
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights that nasal and septal deviations are highly prevalent in patients requiring orthognathic surgery, and their accurate diagnosis is essential for successful orthognathic diagnosis and surgical planning. These findings support the inclusion of nasal assessments in the treatment plans for orthognathic surgery patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.