Cornea · 2023
Automatic Classification of Slit-Lamp Photographs by Imaging Illumination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Ming-Chen, Deng Callie, Greenwald Miles F, Farsiu Sina, Prajna N Venkatesh, Nallasamy Nambi, Pawar Mercy, Hart Jenna N, Sr Sumithra, Kochar Prabhleen, Selvaraj Suvitha, Levine Harry, Amescua Guillermo, Sepulveda-Beltran Paula A, Niziol Leslie M, Woodward Maria A, and the AQUA Study Team
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to facilitate deep learning systems in image annotations for diagnosing keratitis type by developing an automated algorithm to classify slit-lamp photographs (SLPs) based on illumination technique.
METHODS: SLPs were collected from patients with corneal ulcer at Kellogg Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, and Aravind Eye Care Systems. Illumination techniques were slit beam, diffuse white light, diffuse blue light with fluorescein, and sclerotic scatter (ScS). Images were manually labeled for illumination and randomly split into training, validation, and testing data sets (70%:15%:15%). Classification algorithms including MobileNetV2, ResNet50, LeNet, AlexNet, multilayer perceptron, and k-nearest neighborhood were trained to distinguish 4 type of illumination techniques. The algorithm performances on the test data set were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for accuracy, F1 score, and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC-ROC), overall and by class (one-vs-rest).
RESULTS: A total of 12,132 images from 409 patients were analyzed, including 41.8% (n = 5069) slit-beam photographs, 21.2% (2571) diffuse white light, 19.5% (2364) diffuse blue light, and 17.5% (2128) ScS. MobileNetV2 achieved the highest overall F1 score of 97.95% (CI, 97.94%-97.97%), AUC-ROC of 99.83% (99.72%-99.9%), and accuracy of 98.98% (98.97%-98.98%). The F1 scores for slit beam, diffuse white light, diffuse blue light, and ScS were 97.82% (97.80%-97.84%), 96.62% (96.58%-96.66%), 99.88% (99.87%-99.89%), and 97.59% (97.55%-97.62%), respectively. Slit beam and ScS were the 2 most frequently misclassified illumination.
CONCLUSIONS: MobileNetV2 accurately labeled illumination of SLPs using a large data set of corneal images. Effective, automatic classification of SLPs is key to integrating deep learning systems for clinical decision support into practice workflows.
METHODS: SLPs were collected from patients with corneal ulcer at Kellogg Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, and Aravind Eye Care Systems. Illumination techniques were slit beam, diffuse white light, diffuse blue light with fluorescein, and sclerotic scatter (ScS). Images were manually labeled for illumination and randomly split into training, validation, and testing data sets (70%:15%:15%). Classification algorithms including MobileNetV2, ResNet50, LeNet, AlexNet, multilayer perceptron, and k-nearest neighborhood were trained to distinguish 4 type of illumination techniques. The algorithm performances on the test data set were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for accuracy, F1 score, and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC-ROC), overall and by class (one-vs-rest).
RESULTS: A total of 12,132 images from 409 patients were analyzed, including 41.8% (n = 5069) slit-beam photographs, 21.2% (2571) diffuse white light, 19.5% (2364) diffuse blue light, and 17.5% (2128) ScS. MobileNetV2 achieved the highest overall F1 score of 97.95% (CI, 97.94%-97.97%), AUC-ROC of 99.83% (99.72%-99.9%), and accuracy of 98.98% (98.97%-98.98%). The F1 scores for slit beam, diffuse white light, diffuse blue light, and ScS were 97.82% (97.80%-97.84%), 96.62% (96.58%-96.66%), 99.88% (99.87%-99.89%), and 97.59% (97.55%-97.62%), respectively. Slit beam and ScS were the 2 most frequently misclassified illumination.
CONCLUSIONS: MobileNetV2 accurately labeled illumination of SLPs using a large data set of corneal images. Effective, automatic classification of SLPs is key to integrating deep learning systems for clinical decision support into practice workflows.