Texas Heart Institute journal · 2022
Anterior and Posterior Pulmonary Cusp Augmentation in the Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tasoglu Irfan, Turkcan Basak Soran, Tumer Naim Boran, Atalay Atakan, Eris Deniz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study, we compared the results from 2 pulmonary valve augmentation techniques in patients undergoing surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot.
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2018, 18 patients had anterior pulmonary valve repair at our institution, and 26 patients had both anterior and posterior pulmonary valve repair.
RESULTS: Patients ranged from 6 months to 30 years of age. The median follow-up period was 8 months in the anterior augmentation group and 5 months in the anterior and posterior augmentation group. Postoperative echocardiograms indicated that only 2 patients (11%) in the anterior augmentation group had moderate or severe pulmonary insufficiency, compared with no patients in the anterior and posterior augmentation group. At follow-up, pulmonary insufficiency was seen in 3 patients (17%) in the anterior augmentation group and no patients in the anterior and posterior augmentation group.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the native pulmonary valve accompanied by pulmonary cusp augmentation can decrease or even circumvent postoperative pulmonary insufficiency. Both anterior augmentation and anterior and posterior augmentation techniques are easily applied; however, we believe that the anterior and posterior augmentation technique is superior in terms of early postoperative and follow-up pulmonary insufficiency outcomes.
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2018, 18 patients had anterior pulmonary valve repair at our institution, and 26 patients had both anterior and posterior pulmonary valve repair.
RESULTS: Patients ranged from 6 months to 30 years of age. The median follow-up period was 8 months in the anterior augmentation group and 5 months in the anterior and posterior augmentation group. Postoperative echocardiograms indicated that only 2 patients (11%) in the anterior augmentation group had moderate or severe pulmonary insufficiency, compared with no patients in the anterior and posterior augmentation group. At follow-up, pulmonary insufficiency was seen in 3 patients (17%) in the anterior augmentation group and no patients in the anterior and posterior augmentation group.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the native pulmonary valve accompanied by pulmonary cusp augmentation can decrease or even circumvent postoperative pulmonary insufficiency. Both anterior augmentation and anterior and posterior augmentation techniques are easily applied; however, we believe that the anterior and posterior augmentation technique is superior in terms of early postoperative and follow-up pulmonary insufficiency outcomes.