Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
Repeat tarsoconjunctival flap with limited tarsal support in lower eyelid reconstruction.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lam Helena, DeBacker Christopher M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The Köllner-Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap is a well-known reconstructive workhorse for the repair of full-thickness lower eyelid defects but repeat use for repair of the same eyelid has been seldom reported.
METHODS: Over a fifteen-year period, two patients were identified to have undergone a successive tarsoconjunctival flap procedure following recurrent malignancies by a single oculoplastic surgeon. Using this successive technique required careful dissection in scarred tissue planes and only 1.5 mm of vertical tarsal height incorporated into the tarsoconjunctival flap.
RESULTS: Despite limited residual tarsal support in the flap, both cases achieved adequate lid position, corneal protection, and lid stability on long-term follow up, with no evident donor site complications at 6 months and 4 years' follow-up respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat procedures may represent a viable reconstructive option for recurrent eyelid defects despite minimal tarsal support when alternative approaches carry greater morbidity.
METHODS: Over a fifteen-year period, two patients were identified to have undergone a successive tarsoconjunctival flap procedure following recurrent malignancies by a single oculoplastic surgeon. Using this successive technique required careful dissection in scarred tissue planes and only 1.5 mm of vertical tarsal height incorporated into the tarsoconjunctival flap.
RESULTS: Despite limited residual tarsal support in the flap, both cases achieved adequate lid position, corneal protection, and lid stability on long-term follow up, with no evident donor site complications at 6 months and 4 years' follow-up respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat procedures may represent a viable reconstructive option for recurrent eyelid defects despite minimal tarsal support when alternative approaches carry greater morbidity.