Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026
A new amyloid PET evaluation method using separated gray-matter histogram based on three-component model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okuyama Chio, Oishi Naoya, Ishizu Koichi, Hasegawa Hiroshi, Ito Miki, Fujita Yoshiharu, Kusano Kuninori, Okina Tomoko, Kagawa Shinya, Watanabe Hiroyuki, Higashi Tatsuya, Yamauchi Hiroshi, Ono Masahiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We have constructed a three-component model underlying amyloid PET accumulation and developed a new gray matter histogram evaluation method based on this model. This study aims to validate the utility of the new method compared with conventional visual and SUVR-based quantitative evaluation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on amyloid PET/CT data from 63 participants (25 healthy volunteers, 38 patients with dementia or cognitive impairment) of previous study using 18F-FPYBF-2. Subjects were visually classified into three groups: negative, borderline, and positive, and quantitatively evaluated using composed standardized uptake value (comSUVR) with a reference to cerebellar cortex. Histograms were generated for the whole-brain, gray matter (GM-histogram), and white matter (WM-histogram) based on probability-tissue maps. The GM-histogram was further decomposed into two Gaussian components: G1 and G2 using statistical software. Parameters of whole-brain histogram: skewness, mode-to-mean ratio (MMR), and parameters of GM-histogram: GM-kurtosis, µG2 (mean of G2), and πG2 (proportion of G2), were compared among visual groups and the correlation with comSUVR was evaluated. RESULTS: The GM-histogram was sharply unimodal in visually negative group but showed a wide shape to bimodal patterns in visually positive cases. Visually border group showed significantly higher πG2 than negative group, and positive group showed significantly higher µG2 than border group. GM-kurtosis and µG2 showed stronger negative (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.7539) and positive (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.8589) correlations with ComSUVR, respectively than the correlations between whole-brain histogram parameters and ComSUVR. CONCLUSION: Our proposed GM-histogram provides a visually comprehensive morphology and quantitative indicators that match conventional visual and SUVR-based assessments and may potentially detect even subtle amyloid accumulation. This method is considered promising as a complementary tool for early diagnosis and treatment monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease.