MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489420938101

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2020

Outpatient Parotidectomy: A Retrospective Series.

Michel Margaret C, Mulcahy Collin F, Benito Daniel A, Patel Sahil, Badger Christopher, Kane Sean, Li Ning-Wei, Goodman Joseph F, Thakkar Punam G, Joshi Arjun S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Recent literature suggests that outpatient head and neck surgery is safe and may decrease costs. This study assesses whether outpatient parotidectomy differs in complication type and rate from inpatient surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent parotidectomy at our institution from 2011 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and divided by inpatient or outpatient status. Complications including infection, seroma, salivary fistula, hematoma, and flap necrosis, as well as readmission rates were tabulated. Drain placement, related to tumor size, was also analyzed using a receiver operating curve.

RESULTS

144 patients had available data for analysis. Nine of the 144 patients had complications. Seven of 98 outpatients and two of 46 inpatients had complications. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (P = .518). Tumor size ≥4.62 cm3 was associated with drain placement (P = .044).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient parotidectomy is a safe and viable alternative for carefully selected patients.

Для цитирования: Michel Margaret C, Mulcahy Collin F, Benito Daniel A, Patel Sahil, Badger Christopher, Kane Sean, Li Ning-Wei, Goodman Joseph F, Thakkar Punam G, Joshi Arjun S. Outpatient Parotidectomy: A Retrospective Series.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0003489420938101.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.