The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2012
Left atrial radiofrequency ablation associated with valve surgery: midterm outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nardi Paolo, Mve Mvondo Charles, Scafuri Antonio, Pellegrino Antonio, D'Auria Francesca, Polisca Patrizio, Zeitani Jacob, Chiariello Luigi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Left atrial ablation is a surgical standard technique for the treatment of persistent or chronic atrial fibrillation (p-AF and c-AF, respectively).Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate midterm results of left atrial ablation according to modified Maze procedure in patients affected by p-AF or c-AF and concomitant mitral or aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment.
METHODS: A total of 108 patients (age, mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 66 ± 8.5 years) underwent left atrial ablation by means of unipolar (n = 62) or bipolar (n = 66) radiofrequency for p-AF (n = 28) or c-AF (n = 100) in association with mitral (n = 93) or mitral and aortic valve (n = 35) surgery.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.8%. Patients with preoperative c-AF had preoperative greater value of left atrial diameter (56.7 ± 7.4 vs. 52 ± 9 mm, p = 0.05) than those with p-AF. At 9 years after Maze procedure, 86% (n = 24/28) of patients with preoperative p-AF were in sinus rhythm versus 28% (n = 27/95) with c-AF (p < 0.0001). Preoperative c-AF and left atrial diameter of 75 mm or more predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence. In patients in sinus rhythm compared with those in residual atrial fibrillation, survival was 100 versus 86% ± 6.4%, New York Heart Association class was 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.6, and need of lifelong anticoagulation therapy was 43 versus 91% (p < 0.05, for all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial Maze procedure for p-AF offers better chances to conversion in sinus rhythm as compared with long-standing c-AF. Survival, functional status, and quality of life are superior in patients who benefit from sinus rhythm.
METHODS: A total of 108 patients (age, mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 66 ± 8.5 years) underwent left atrial ablation by means of unipolar (n = 62) or bipolar (n = 66) radiofrequency for p-AF (n = 28) or c-AF (n = 100) in association with mitral (n = 93) or mitral and aortic valve (n = 35) surgery.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.8%. Patients with preoperative c-AF had preoperative greater value of left atrial diameter (56.7 ± 7.4 vs. 52 ± 9 mm, p = 0.05) than those with p-AF. At 9 years after Maze procedure, 86% (n = 24/28) of patients with preoperative p-AF were in sinus rhythm versus 28% (n = 27/95) with c-AF (p < 0.0001). Preoperative c-AF and left atrial diameter of 75 mm or more predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence. In patients in sinus rhythm compared with those in residual atrial fibrillation, survival was 100 versus 86% ± 6.4%, New York Heart Association class was 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.6, and need of lifelong anticoagulation therapy was 43 versus 91% (p < 0.05, for all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial Maze procedure for p-AF offers better chances to conversion in sinus rhythm as compared with long-standing c-AF. Survival, functional status, and quality of life are superior in patients who benefit from sinus rhythm.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAortic ValveAtrial FibrillationAtrial Function, LeftCardiac Surgical ProceduresCatheter AblationChi-Square DistributionChronic DiseaseFemaleHeart AtriaHeart Valve DiseasesHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMitral ValveProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome