IJU case reports · 2026
Concurrent Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma and Prostate Tuberculosis: A Case Report.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suzuki Rikuo, Kawai Taketo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; however, the simultaneous occurrence of urogenital tuberculosis and bladder cancer is rare. Primary prostate tuberculosis is relatively uncommon in patients with urogenital tuberculosis.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented with gross hematuria and irritative voiding symptoms. Cystoscopy revealed a bladder tumor. The PSA level was elevated (8.32 ng/mL), and MRI findings suggested prostate cancer. Chest radiography and CT indicated pulmonary tuberculosis, which was confirmed by sputum mycobacterial culture and PCR. Urine mycobacterial cultures revealed urinary tuberculosis. TURBT and prostate biopsy were performed after initiating treatment for tuberculosis and confirming sputum conversion. Histopathological examination revealed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and prostate tuberculosis.
CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of concurrent bladder urothelial carcinoma and prostate tuberculosis. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis may benefit from evaluation for urogenital tuberculosis, including prostatic involvement, and consideration of coexisting urothelial carcinoma.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented with gross hematuria and irritative voiding symptoms. Cystoscopy revealed a bladder tumor. The PSA level was elevated (8.32 ng/mL), and MRI findings suggested prostate cancer. Chest radiography and CT indicated pulmonary tuberculosis, which was confirmed by sputum mycobacterial culture and PCR. Urine mycobacterial cultures revealed urinary tuberculosis. TURBT and prostate biopsy were performed after initiating treatment for tuberculosis and confirming sputum conversion. Histopathological examination revealed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and prostate tuberculosis.
CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of concurrent bladder urothelial carcinoma and prostate tuberculosis. Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis may benefit from evaluation for urogenital tuberculosis, including prostatic involvement, and consideration of coexisting urothelial carcinoma.