Medicine · 2026
Prospective evaluation of post-ERCP gastrointestinal dysfunction using the I-FEED scoring system: A cohort study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Tingting, Yan Jing, Liu Xiaoli, Li Rui, Cao Guanbai
Аннотация
To determine the incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction after ERCP, identify factors associated with its development, and evaluate the correlation between the I-FEED score and clinical outcomes, this single-center, prospective, observational cohort study consecutively enrolled patients undergoing elective ERCP, with 30-day follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years and scheduled elective ERCP for any indication. Collected data included demographics, procedural details, I-FEED scores, length of stay, Quality of Recovery-9 scores, and 30-day readmission. The I-FEED score was the primary assessment tool. An I-FEED score ≥ 6 is defined as Post-ERCP gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). Analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0. Among 273 analyzed patients (59.34% male), choledocholithiasis was the most common indication (63.73%). POGD occurred in 54 patients (19.8%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was the most common condition associated with POGD (34 cases, 62.9%). Univariate analysis identified several factors associated with POGD, including younger age, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), PEP, cholangitis, bleeding, difficult cannulation, >1 pancreatic guidewire passage, pancreatic contrast injection, and pancreatic sphincterotomy. In multivariate analysis, younger age, suspected SOD, difficult cannulation, pancreatic sphincterotomy, and PEP were independently associated with POGD. An I-FEED score ≥ 6 was statistically significantly associated with: a longer median length of stay compared to scores < 6, a higher rate of nasogastric tube insertion, and lower patient satisfaction scores. POGD is a frequent and clinically significant occurrence after ERCP, affecting nearly one-fifth of patients. The I-FEED scoring system appears valuable for objectively assessing gastrointestinal recovery post-ERCP and may inform clinical management and postoperative care.