World neurosurgery · 2017
Use of Pneumoperitoneal Puncture for Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Lumboperitoneal Shunt Surgery: Technical Note.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Junhua, Jin Xin, Zhang Xianghua, Kong Jun, Lin Yihai, Wu Zhangyi, Zhang Xinwen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In hydrocephalus shunt surgery, a peritoneal catheter is traditionally inserted with laparotomy incision. The abdominal incision length will not be shorter than 3 cm in most cases. A longer incision has to be made in obese patients. The lateral position in lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) surgery also increases the difficulty of laparotomy. This report introduces a simple technique of pneumoperitoneal puncture for peritoneal catheter placement in LPS surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-eight communicating hydrocephalus cases underwent pneumoperitoneal puncture in an LPS operation. Abdominal incision length, time for peritoneal catheter placement, and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The length of the abdominal incision was 1 cm, and the average time for peritoneal catheter placement was 3.5 minutes. No patient suffered from infection and obstruction. Two cases of subdural hematoma because of cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: The pneumoperitoneal puncture technique has proven, in our experience, to be a minimally invasive, simple, and reliable method in a peritoneal catheter placement procedure. This technique, which needs to be assessed further by larger case series, may be considered a new method of choice for peritoneal catheter placement in LPS surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-eight communicating hydrocephalus cases underwent pneumoperitoneal puncture in an LPS operation. Abdominal incision length, time for peritoneal catheter placement, and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The length of the abdominal incision was 1 cm, and the average time for peritoneal catheter placement was 3.5 minutes. No patient suffered from infection and obstruction. Two cases of subdural hematoma because of cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: The pneumoperitoneal puncture technique has proven, in our experience, to be a minimally invasive, simple, and reliable method in a peritoneal catheter placement procedure. This technique, which needs to be assessed further by larger case series, may be considered a new method of choice for peritoneal catheter placement in LPS surgery.