Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2025
Transcriptomic stratification predicts response to rituximab, abatacept, or the association of hydroxychloroquine and leflunomide in 3 randomised controlled clinical trials of Sjögren's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chevet Baptiste, Devauchelle-Pensec Valérie, Pontarini Elena, Baloche Valentin, Bombardieri Michele, Bowman Simon J, Barnes Michael, Sreih Antoine G, Liu Jinqi, Kelly Sheila, Christodoulou Antonia, Moingeon Philippe, Laigle Laurence, Soret Perrine, Le Dantec Christelle, Pers Jacques-Olivier, Alarcon-Riquelme Marta E, Barturen Guillermo, Mariette Xavier, van Roon Joel, Seror Raphaèle, Nocturne Gaetane, Cornec Divi, Foulquier Nathan, PRECISEADS Clinical Consortium, NECESSITY consortium
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Sjögren's disease (SjD) is clinically and biologically heterogeneous, and no immunomodulatory drug has yet demonstrated efficacy in phase 3 trials. We previously identified 4 transcriptomic endotypes in SjD patients using whole-blood RNA sequencing. We hypothesised that these endotypes may predict differential therapeutic responses.
METHODS: We analysed clinical, biological, and transcriptomic data from 3 randomised controlled trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine-leflunomide (HCQ-LEF; n = 18; RepurpSS-I trial), rituximab (RTX; n = 56; TRACTISS trial), and abatacept (n = 117). Patients were assigned to the 4 endotypes using semisupervised uniform manifold approximation and projection combined with a support vector machine model. Demographics, disease activity, and therapeutic response, as defined by the Sjögren Tool for Assessing Response index, were compared across clusters in both pooled and individual trial analyses.
RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 81, 24, 80, and 6 were classified into clusters 1 to 4, respectively. European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index scores were comparable across clusters, while the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index was significantly higher in clusters 3 and 4 vs clusters 1 and 2 (P = .003). In pooled analyses, patients in cluster 1 had significantly greater response rates with active treatment vs placebo (61.5% vs 32.6%: P = .016), with a similar trend in the RTX trial. In contrast, patients in cluster 3 benefitted from HCQ-LEF, whereas cluster 2 (healthy-like patients) showed no significant response to any therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptomic stratification of SjD patients revealed differential responses to HCQ-LEF and RTX. Notably, healthy-like patients exhibited minimal treatment response, suggesting they may be unsuitable candidates for future therapeutic trials.
METHODS: We analysed clinical, biological, and transcriptomic data from 3 randomised controlled trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine-leflunomide (HCQ-LEF; n = 18; RepurpSS-I trial), rituximab (RTX; n = 56; TRACTISS trial), and abatacept (n = 117). Patients were assigned to the 4 endotypes using semisupervised uniform manifold approximation and projection combined with a support vector machine model. Demographics, disease activity, and therapeutic response, as defined by the Sjögren Tool for Assessing Response index, were compared across clusters in both pooled and individual trial analyses.
RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 81, 24, 80, and 6 were classified into clusters 1 to 4, respectively. European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index scores were comparable across clusters, while the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index was significantly higher in clusters 3 and 4 vs clusters 1 and 2 (P = .003). In pooled analyses, patients in cluster 1 had significantly greater response rates with active treatment vs placebo (61.5% vs 32.6%: P = .016), with a similar trend in the RTX trial. In contrast, patients in cluster 3 benefitted from HCQ-LEF, whereas cluster 2 (healthy-like patients) showed no significant response to any therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptomic stratification of SjD patients revealed differential responses to HCQ-LEF and RTX. Notably, healthy-like patients exhibited minimal treatment response, suggesting they may be unsuitable candidates for future therapeutic trials.