Nuclear medicine communications · 2020
Absence of hepatic activity in lymphoscintigraphy performed with Tc-99m-Nanoscan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Syed Adeel, Levart Danielle, Vadrucci Manuela, Gibson Victoria, Peters A Michael
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: For assessment of lower extremity swelling using lymphoscintigraphy, several nuclear medicine departments in the UK have recently switched from Tc-Nanocoll to Tc-Nanoscan. The aim of the study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative features of lymphoscintigraphy between these two tracers.
METHODS: Twenty patients received Tc-Nanocoll and 20 received Tc-Nanoscan either side of the switch-over in our department. Tracers were compared with respect to visualisation of the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes and urine (all graded by consensus from 0 to 3; invisible-to-very prominent); and with respect to ilio-inguinal nodal quantification and ratio of liver-to-summed bilateral ilio-inguinal nodal activity at 120 min postinjection (L/N120). Scans were deemed abnormal when there was lymph diversion through skin or deep system, no activity in ilio-inguinal nodes at 60 min or negligible ilio-inguinal activity (<5%, left plus right) at 120 min.
RESULTS: Liver was visualised in 18/20 Tc-Nanocoll but only 3/20 Tc-Nanoscan scans. Moreover, para-aortic activity was less prominent after Tc-Nanoscan. Urinary activity was more prominent after Tc-Nanocoll. There were 9/20 patients with stomach activity after Tc-Nanocoll compared with 1/20 after Tc-Nanoscan. Urinary and stomach activities correlated. There was an elevated L/N120, and therefore a suspicion of peripheral lympho-venous communication, in the single Tc-Nanoscan patient who displayed prominent hepatic activity.
CONCLUSION: Hepatic activity is the result of accumulation of colloidal degradation products generated in lymph nodes, rather than intact colloid. Tc-Nanoscan gives less hepatic activity than Tc-Nanocoll because it is more resistant to intranodal degradation. Peripheral lymphovenous communication remains a possible alternative route for activity to reach the liver.
METHODS: Twenty patients received Tc-Nanocoll and 20 received Tc-Nanoscan either side of the switch-over in our department. Tracers were compared with respect to visualisation of the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes and urine (all graded by consensus from 0 to 3; invisible-to-very prominent); and with respect to ilio-inguinal nodal quantification and ratio of liver-to-summed bilateral ilio-inguinal nodal activity at 120 min postinjection (L/N120). Scans were deemed abnormal when there was lymph diversion through skin or deep system, no activity in ilio-inguinal nodes at 60 min or negligible ilio-inguinal activity (<5%, left plus right) at 120 min.
RESULTS: Liver was visualised in 18/20 Tc-Nanocoll but only 3/20 Tc-Nanoscan scans. Moreover, para-aortic activity was less prominent after Tc-Nanoscan. Urinary activity was more prominent after Tc-Nanocoll. There were 9/20 patients with stomach activity after Tc-Nanocoll compared with 1/20 after Tc-Nanoscan. Urinary and stomach activities correlated. There was an elevated L/N120, and therefore a suspicion of peripheral lympho-venous communication, in the single Tc-Nanoscan patient who displayed prominent hepatic activity.
CONCLUSION: Hepatic activity is the result of accumulation of colloidal degradation products generated in lymph nodes, rather than intact colloid. Tc-Nanoscan gives less hepatic activity than Tc-Nanocoll because it is more resistant to intranodal degradation. Peripheral lymphovenous communication remains a possible alternative route for activity to reach the liver.