Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
Classification of hypotony maculopathy based on optical coherence tomography findings and risk factors for visual outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kanzaki Yuki, Fujiwara Miyuki, Fujiwara Rie, Okamoto Sara, Mitsui Naruka, Shiode Yusuke, Hosokawa Mio Morizane, Matoba Ryo, Morita Tetsuro, Hayashi Junko, Masuda Yuki, Akatsuka Riku, Tsuji Akihiro, Morizane Yuki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To classify hypotony maculopathy (HM) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings and to investigate the associations among morphological types, clinical factors, and visual outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 eyes that developed HM after trabeculectomy. HM was classified according to the distribution and configuration of chorioretinal undulations on OCT B-scans. Between-group comparisons were performed, and factors associated with the morphological classification and logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months after HM onset (3-month BCVA) were determined.
RESULTS: HM was classified into three OCT-based types by categorizing chorioretinal undulations as folds (U-shaped troughs) or spikes (V-shaped troughs): Type 1, folds only on vertical scans; Type 2, folds on both vertical and horizontal scans; Type 3, folds on both scans, with spikes. Axial length in Type 3 was significantly longer than that in Type 2 (P = 0.034). Subfoveal choroidal thickness was significantly thinner in Type 3 than in Types 1 and 2 (both P < 0.001). Minimum intraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly higher in Type 1 than in Types 2 and 3 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), with no difference between Types 2 and 3. In multivariable analysis using Type 1 as the reference group, minimum IOP was significantly associated with Type 2 (P = 0.001). For Type 3, both minimum IOP (P = 0.03) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = 0.02) showed significant associations. The 3-month BCVA was significantly worse in Type 3 than in Types 1 and 2 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). Chorioretinal spikes and preoperative BCVA were significantly associated with 3-month BCVA (both P < 0.001). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the discriminative ability of subfoveal choroidal thickness for the presence of chorioretinal spikes (AUC = 0.876). A thickness of 195.0 μm was identified as a candidate cutoff value (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 72.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: In HM following TLE, chorioretinal spikes and preoperative BCVA are significantly associated with the 3-month BCVA. In HM, a thin subfoveal choroid (< 195.0 μm), may be associated with chorioretinal spikes, suggesting the need for careful postoperative IOP and OCT monitoring.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 eyes that developed HM after trabeculectomy. HM was classified according to the distribution and configuration of chorioretinal undulations on OCT B-scans. Between-group comparisons were performed, and factors associated with the morphological classification and logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months after HM onset (3-month BCVA) were determined.
RESULTS: HM was classified into three OCT-based types by categorizing chorioretinal undulations as folds (U-shaped troughs) or spikes (V-shaped troughs): Type 1, folds only on vertical scans; Type 2, folds on both vertical and horizontal scans; Type 3, folds on both scans, with spikes. Axial length in Type 3 was significantly longer than that in Type 2 (P = 0.034). Subfoveal choroidal thickness was significantly thinner in Type 3 than in Types 1 and 2 (both P < 0.001). Minimum intraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly higher in Type 1 than in Types 2 and 3 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), with no difference between Types 2 and 3. In multivariable analysis using Type 1 as the reference group, minimum IOP was significantly associated with Type 2 (P = 0.001). For Type 3, both minimum IOP (P = 0.03) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = 0.02) showed significant associations. The 3-month BCVA was significantly worse in Type 3 than in Types 1 and 2 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). Chorioretinal spikes and preoperative BCVA were significantly associated with 3-month BCVA (both P < 0.001). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed the discriminative ability of subfoveal choroidal thickness for the presence of chorioretinal spikes (AUC = 0.876). A thickness of 195.0 μm was identified as a candidate cutoff value (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 72.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: In HM following TLE, chorioretinal spikes and preoperative BCVA are significantly associated with the 3-month BCVA. In HM, a thin subfoveal choroid (< 195.0 μm), may be associated with chorioretinal spikes, suggesting the need for careful postoperative IOP and OCT monitoring.