DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.031
Immunohistochemical evaluation of infiltrating immune cells in endometrial biopsy of female genital tuberculosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Female Genital Tuberculosis (FGTB) causes infertility in a large number of females in developing countries. Presence of granuloma on histopathological examination of endometrial samples is diagnostic of FGTB. But immunohistochemical evaluation of endometrial aspirates has not been explored before.
AIM: To evaluate the immunohistochemical delineation of immune cells in FGTB.
METHODS
1515 infertile women from 20 to 35 years were enrolled and underwent endometrial aspiration (EA), which was subjected to microbiological and histopathological examination along with PCR. Patients positive for conventional tests like granulomas, acid fast bacilli, mycobacterial culture on LJ medium or liquid (MGIT) culture were started on antitubercular therapy. Conventional test negative but PCR positive patients were posted for laparoscopy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for LCA, CD68, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD 20, CD138, IFN gamma and IL10 were evaluated.
RESULT: 38/1515 (2.5%) subjects tested positive for conventional methods. PCR-TB was positive in 615/1515 samples (40.59%). On IHC, the number of CD45 (LCA) positive immune cells (p = 0.03) and IFN gamma (p = 0.002) and IL10 expression (p = 0.012) at 1 + level were higher in the PCR positive samples. Laparoscopy done in 418/463 patients and 89/418 (21.3%) showed definitive findings of tuberculosis. CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68 and CD138 showed no correlation with PCR and laparoscopy.
CONCLUSION
Increased IFN gamma and IL 10 expressing immune cells in PCR positive EA suggests subclinical early changes, and can be useful as a research tool but have no role in diagnosing FGTB.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.