International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024
Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy as a complementary method for predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a phase II prospective and diagnostic trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Yaoyi, Xie Yumo, Wang Puning, Chen Yao, Qin Si, Li Fangqian, Wu Yuanhui, Huang Mingzhe, Hou Zehui, Cai Yonghua, He Xiaosheng, Lin Hongcheng, Hu Bang, Qin Qiyuan, Ma Tenghui, Tan Shuyun, Liao Yi, Ke Jia, Zhang Di, Lai Sicong, Jiang ZhiPeng, Wang Huaiming, Xiang Jun, Cai Zerong, Wang Hui, He Xiaowen, Yang Zuli, Ren Donglin, Wu Xiaojian, Hong Yisong, Huang Meijin, Luo Yanxin, Liu Guangjian, Lin Jinxin
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE: Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment had better oncological outcomes. However, reliable methods for accurately predicting pCR remain limited.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transrectal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy (TRUS-TCB) adds diagnostic value to conventional modalities for predicting pathological complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study evaluated data of patients with rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant treatment and reassessed using TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities before surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was accuracy, along with secondary outcomes including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value in predicting tumour residues. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard.
RESULTS: Between June 2021 and June 2022, a total of 74 patients were enroled, with 63 patients ultimately evaluated. Among them, 17 patients (28%) exhibited a complete pathological response. TRUS-TCB demonstrated an accuracy of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82) in predicting tumour residues. The combined use of TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional modalities alone (0.75 vs. 0.59, P =0.02). Furthermore, TRUS-TCB correctly reclassified 52% of patients erroneously classified as having a complete clinical response by conventional methods. The occurrence of only one mild adverse event was observed.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: TRUS-TCB proves to be a safe and accessible tool for reevaluation with minimal complications. The incorporation of TRUS-TCB alongside conventional methods leads to enhanced diagnostic performance.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transrectal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy (TRUS-TCB) adds diagnostic value to conventional modalities for predicting pathological complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study evaluated data of patients with rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant treatment and reassessed using TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities before surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was accuracy, along with secondary outcomes including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value in predicting tumour residues. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard.
RESULTS: Between June 2021 and June 2022, a total of 74 patients were enroled, with 63 patients ultimately evaluated. Among them, 17 patients (28%) exhibited a complete pathological response. TRUS-TCB demonstrated an accuracy of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82) in predicting tumour residues. The combined use of TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional modalities alone (0.75 vs. 0.59, P =0.02). Furthermore, TRUS-TCB correctly reclassified 52% of patients erroneously classified as having a complete clinical response by conventional methods. The occurrence of only one mild adverse event was observed.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: TRUS-TCB proves to be a safe and accessible tool for reevaluation with minimal complications. The incorporation of TRUS-TCB alongside conventional methods leads to enhanced diagnostic performance.