Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
Increased motor cortex excitability in chronic complex regional pain syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vanhanen Jukka, Nordberg Janne, Paavola Janika, Julkunen Petro, Munoz Miguel, Mäkelä Jyrki P, Vaalto Selja, Kirveskari Erika, Jääskeläinen Satu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To characterize corticospinal excitability and cortical motor representation in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I and type II, addressing inconsistencies in prior research regarding these mechanisms.
METHODS: Fifty-nine CRPS patients (44 type I and 15 type II) underwent TMS and paired-pulse TMS examinations to assess resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and latency, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) bilaterally, alongside cortical representation areas of the hands at M1 cortex. Results were compared with 23 healthy subjects.
RESULTS: CRPS patients had lower RMT, higher MEP amplitudes, and lower ICF than healthy subjects. The SICI in CRPS patients showed no interhemispheric differences and did not differ from healthy subjects. MEP latency was shorter to the affected than to the unaffected hand in CRPS type II. Higher pain intensity correlated with higher degree of intracortical facilitation bilaterally, and with smaller motor representation area of the unaffected hand.
CONCLUSION: Findings of this study suggest increased motor cortical excitability in CRPS patients relative to healthy subjects, with no interhemispheric asymmetry of SICI or ICF observed in chronic CRPS.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results provide a comprehensive view of intracortical inhibition, facilitation and corticospinal excitability in chronic CRPS.
METHODS: Fifty-nine CRPS patients (44 type I and 15 type II) underwent TMS and paired-pulse TMS examinations to assess resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and latency, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) bilaterally, alongside cortical representation areas of the hands at M1 cortex. Results were compared with 23 healthy subjects.
RESULTS: CRPS patients had lower RMT, higher MEP amplitudes, and lower ICF than healthy subjects. The SICI in CRPS patients showed no interhemispheric differences and did not differ from healthy subjects. MEP latency was shorter to the affected than to the unaffected hand in CRPS type II. Higher pain intensity correlated with higher degree of intracortical facilitation bilaterally, and with smaller motor representation area of the unaffected hand.
CONCLUSION: Findings of this study suggest increased motor cortical excitability in CRPS patients relative to healthy subjects, with no interhemispheric asymmetry of SICI or ICF observed in chronic CRPS.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results provide a comprehensive view of intracortical inhibition, facilitation and corticospinal excitability in chronic CRPS.