American journal of ophthalmology · 2026
Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Hao, He Weimin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To characterize clinicopathologic and imaging differences between ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) and IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) and to evaluate clinical and artificial intelligence-assisted approaches for differentiating these entities.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center observational cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred patients with pathologically confirmed orbital lymphoproliferative disease, including OAML (n = 287) and IgG4-ROD (n = 113), treated at West China Hospital between 2010 and 2024.
METHODS: Clinical, serologic, imaging, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features were systematically compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables was developed for early differentiation. Artificial intelligence models were additionally trained using radiological CT/MRI images and digital pathology whole-slide images.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics between OAML and IgG4-ROD and diagnostic discrimination assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: OAML more frequently presented as unilateral orbital or conjunctival lesions and showed monoclonal features, including light-chain restriction and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. In contrast, IgG4-ROD predominantly involved bilateral lacrimal glands and demonstrated fibro-inflammatory changes with abundant IgG4⁺ plasma cells. Serum IgG4 levels overlapped substantially between groups. The clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.865. Radiology- and pathology-based artificial intelligence models achieved AUCs of 0.933 and 0.946, respectively, and pathology-informed radiology training further improved discrimination (AUC 0.974).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated clinical, imaging, and pathologic assessment provides practical distinctions between OAML and IgG4-ROD. Artificial intelligence-assisted imaging analysis may complement conventional diagnostic pathways and support differentiation in clinically ambiguous orbital lymphoproliferative disease.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center observational cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred patients with pathologically confirmed orbital lymphoproliferative disease, including OAML (n = 287) and IgG4-ROD (n = 113), treated at West China Hospital between 2010 and 2024.
METHODS: Clinical, serologic, imaging, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features were systematically compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables was developed for early differentiation. Artificial intelligence models were additionally trained using radiological CT/MRI images and digital pathology whole-slide images.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics between OAML and IgG4-ROD and diagnostic discrimination assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: OAML more frequently presented as unilateral orbital or conjunctival lesions and showed monoclonal features, including light-chain restriction and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. In contrast, IgG4-ROD predominantly involved bilateral lacrimal glands and demonstrated fibro-inflammatory changes with abundant IgG4⁺ plasma cells. Serum IgG4 levels overlapped substantially between groups. The clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.865. Radiology- and pathology-based artificial intelligence models achieved AUCs of 0.933 and 0.946, respectively, and pathology-informed radiology training further improved discrimination (AUC 0.974).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated clinical, imaging, and pathologic assessment provides practical distinctions between OAML and IgG4-ROD. Artificial intelligence-assisted imaging analysis may complement conventional diagnostic pathways and support differentiation in clinically ambiguous orbital lymphoproliferative disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin G4-Related DiseaseLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMagnetic Resonance ImagingOrbital NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray Computed