Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
Patients', family caregivers', and professionals' perspectives on the quality of cancer drug injections at home: A qualitative and comparative study in France.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mittaine-Marzac Bénédicte, Belkhir Rakiba, Jondeau Katayoun, Garderet Laurent, Frenzel Laurent, Ivanoff Sarah, Zogo Arsène, Lapointe Liette, Ankri Joël, Aegerter Philippe, De Stampa Matthieu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: While most patients on cancer treatment receive their injection in a conventional hospital setting, Hospital At Home (HAH) is an alternative solution. This research aims to describe the management of care involving HAH, highlight the expectations and needs of each stakeholder, and identify the key elements of home cancer care compared to the conventional hospital setting.
METHODS: Qualitative, prospective, and exploratory study between patients with active multiple myeloma treated exclusively in a day hospital setting versus patients alternating between a day hospital and HAH. It was based on semi-structured interviews conducted in several hospitals, in the community, and at home with patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Grounded Theory was used for analysis.
RESULTS: Five main dimensions of management of care emerged from the 35 interviews: (i) the hospital decided on patient care regardless of location, (ii) cancer care excluded general practitioners but the HAH intervention improved their involvement, (iii) strong collaboration required between HAH and the hospital for quality and safety of care, (iv) HAH, a way to stay at home but with a complex organization (v) the profile of patients potentially eligible for home cancer injection.
CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the benefits and drawbacks of home-based care delivery from the perspective of patients with multiple myeloma, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals. To promote home-based cancer injections, primary care services should be strengthened in relation to hospitals to achieve an optimal logistical organization for home delivery of care, and to better identify patients eligible for transfer to HAHs.
METHODS: Qualitative, prospective, and exploratory study between patients with active multiple myeloma treated exclusively in a day hospital setting versus patients alternating between a day hospital and HAH. It was based on semi-structured interviews conducted in several hospitals, in the community, and at home with patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Grounded Theory was used for analysis.
RESULTS: Five main dimensions of management of care emerged from the 35 interviews: (i) the hospital decided on patient care regardless of location, (ii) cancer care excluded general practitioners but the HAH intervention improved their involvement, (iii) strong collaboration required between HAH and the hospital for quality and safety of care, (iv) HAH, a way to stay at home but with a complex organization (v) the profile of patients potentially eligible for home cancer injection.
CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the benefits and drawbacks of home-based care delivery from the perspective of patients with multiple myeloma, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals. To promote home-based cancer injections, primary care services should be strengthened in relation to hospitals to achieve an optimal logistical organization for home delivery of care, and to better identify patients eligible for transfer to HAHs.