MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80324-7

Медицинская библиотека · Applied nursing research : ANR · 1996

Practice guidelines for the prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers: evaluating the evidence.

Harrison M B, Wells G, Fisher A, Prince M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Clinical practice guidelines for the prediction and prevention of pressure ulcer (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research [AHCPR], 1992) were evaluated in a Canadian, university-affiliated, acute care hospital. Through a prospective study, the prevalence of pressure ulcers was determined, and pressure ulcer incidence was tracked to evaluate the accuracy of the Braden Scale for risk assessment. The prevalence rate for stage II or greater pressure ulcers was 13.6%; the rate was 29.7% when stage I (persistent redness) was included. In evaluating the Braden Scale's accuracy in predicting risk, the findings from this study were less favorable than previous reports. The total Braden score that appeared to have the best balance of sensitivity (67%) and specificity (66%) was 19. Several factors should be considered: The scale was implemented and tested hospitalwide with a wide range of patient diagnoses, age, and severity; the study was a cross-section of an existing population; and the levels of nursing care and type of staff vary between units ranging from critical to long-term care. This study highlights the need for individual settings to evaluate the AHCPR Guidelines for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.

Для цитирования: Harrison M B, Wells G, Fisher A, Prince M. Practice guidelines for the prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers: evaluating the evidence.. Applied nursing research : ANR. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80324-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.