DOI 10.1080/02688697.2020.1753170
Emergency surgery for brainstem cavernoma haemorrhage with severe neurological presentation. Is it indicated and worthwhile?
Аннотация
Background
Brainstem Cavernoma (BSCM) haemorrhage is a complex condition, especially when patients present rapid neurological deterioration. Traditionally, these patients were initially treated by non-interventional means. Surgery was generally reserved for cases who presented a 'benign' evolution in a subacute/delayed fashion. Timing of surgery remains controversial. Since rebleeding is frequent and carries a high mortality, many of these patients do not tolerate this approach. Urgent/emergent surgery may be indicated and lifesaving.
Methods
A single center experience is reported in which an aggressive approach was used with urgent/emergency surgery carried out on patients with BSCM haemorrhage and rapid neurological deterioration, ventilatory impairment and/or coma. A review of 5 consecutive cases where urgent/emergent surgery was performed is presented. The pre-operative status, pre- and post-operative examinations, surgical approach and neurological residual deficits/outcomes are reported.
Results
Four females and one male with ages ranging from 36 to 66 years with rapid neurological deterioration, ventilatory impairment and/or coma were operated between 2011 and 2018. Favourable outcomes were observed with a modified Rankin Scale varying from 1 to 4. Cranial nerve deficits as well as motor and sensitive deficits were observed but all the patients recovered cognitive integrity.
Conclusions
Our small series reveals an acceptable outcome with ultra-early surgery. This approach appears to be a valid option when there is rapid neurological deterioration, respiratory impairment and/or early onset coma. However, further studies are required to elucidate the optimal strategy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.