JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025
Interaction Between Statin Use, Coronary Artery Disease Phenotypes, on Computed Tomography Angiography, and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Szilveszter Bálint, Vattay Borbála, Boussoussou Melinda, Nagy-Vecsey Milán, Rokszin György, Fábián Ibolya, Simon Judit, Merkely Béla, Maurovich-Horvat Pál, Kolossváry Márton
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although statins are recommended for decreasing cardiovascular risk, their efficacy across different patient phenotypes stratified by coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate whether statins decrease major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among CAD phenotypes according to severity, vulnerability and extent categorized by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
METHODS: The authors analyzed consecutive patients who were referred for coronary CTA at a tertiary center for the assessment of chronic coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint was MACE defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, or revascularization for unstable angina. Statin use was defined as annualized days on statin therapy (days on statin based on redeemed prescriptions, divided by follow-up time), and analyzed for each 10% increase in statin use over the follow-up period. Interaction analysis, adjusting for risk factors was applied to define treatment benefit across CAD phenotypes.
RESULTS: Overall, 11,026 individuals (mean age: 58.6 ± 11.9 years, 54.7% male) were analyzed who underwent coronary CTA between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. A 10% increase in statin use was associated with lower risk for MACE the stratified Cox-regression model in patients with CAD (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92-0.99]; P = 0.006), but not in patients without CAD (aHR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.84-1.07]; P = 0.370). In the total population using interaction analysis including CAD phenotypes, a 10% increase in statin use decreased the risk for MACE in the presence of obstructive CAD (aHR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.85-0.97]; P = 0.006), high-risk plaque (aHR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68-0.98]; P = 0.026), calcium score of ≥400 (aHR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-0.99]; P = 0.024), and segment involvement score of >4 (aHR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.84-0.95]; P < 0.001), but not for any CAD (aHR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.85-1.07]; P = 0.411).
CONCLUSIONS: Statin efficacy to decrease MACE depends on CAD phenotypes and increases with the extent and severity of disease and in the presence of high-risk plaques. Patients without CAD have no benefit from statin therapy regarding MACE. Coronary CTA may play a pivotal role in optimizing statin allocation for personalized treatment decisions to prevent MACE.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate whether statins decrease major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among CAD phenotypes according to severity, vulnerability and extent categorized by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
METHODS: The authors analyzed consecutive patients who were referred for coronary CTA at a tertiary center for the assessment of chronic coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint was MACE defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, or revascularization for unstable angina. Statin use was defined as annualized days on statin therapy (days on statin based on redeemed prescriptions, divided by follow-up time), and analyzed for each 10% increase in statin use over the follow-up period. Interaction analysis, adjusting for risk factors was applied to define treatment benefit across CAD phenotypes.
RESULTS: Overall, 11,026 individuals (mean age: 58.6 ± 11.9 years, 54.7% male) were analyzed who underwent coronary CTA between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. A 10% increase in statin use was associated with lower risk for MACE the stratified Cox-regression model in patients with CAD (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92-0.99]; P = 0.006), but not in patients without CAD (aHR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.84-1.07]; P = 0.370). In the total population using interaction analysis including CAD phenotypes, a 10% increase in statin use decreased the risk for MACE in the presence of obstructive CAD (aHR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.85-0.97]; P = 0.006), high-risk plaque (aHR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68-0.98]; P = 0.026), calcium score of ≥400 (aHR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-0.99]; P = 0.024), and segment involvement score of >4 (aHR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.84-0.95]; P < 0.001), but not for any CAD (aHR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.85-1.07]; P = 0.411).
CONCLUSIONS: Statin efficacy to decrease MACE depends on CAD phenotypes and increases with the extent and severity of disease and in the presence of high-risk plaques. Patients without CAD have no benefit from statin therapy regarding MACE. Coronary CTA may play a pivotal role in optimizing statin allocation for personalized treatment decisions to prevent MACE.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDyslipidemiasHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsProtective FactorsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome