Diagnostic Detour: A Case of Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome Initially Misdiagnosed As Tricyclic Antidepressant Toxicity in a Child.
Аннотация
Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome (OMAS) is a rare pediatric neuroinflammatory disorder. Its recognition is challenging, as early manifestations may resemble toxic, infectious, or metabolic processes. Misdiagnosis and diagnostic delay remain important contributors to poor outcomes. The aim of this report is to describe an unusual case of OMAS initially mistaken for tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) ingestion and to underscore the diagnostic lessons relevant to pediatric emergency, neurology, and toxicology practice. We present a previously healthy four-year-11-month-old boy who was brought to the emergency department following the discovery of missing TCA tablets and three days of vomiting and fever. Initial findings included dehydration, confusion, urinary retention, and dilated pupils, suggesting TCA toxicity. He was treated empirically for possible meningitis while a toxicological evaluation was pursued. Over the next 48 hours, opsoclonus, hyperreflexia with myoclonus, and a wide-based gait emerged, redirecting the differential diagnosis toward OMAS. Neuroimaging and malignancy screening were unremarkable. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein (1189 mg/L), positive oligoclonal bands, reduced glucose (2.0 mmol/L), elevated lactate (2.8 mmol/L), increased lactate dehydrogenase (291 IU/L), and negative neuronal antibody testing. Immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids produced rapid improvement, with complete recovery by six months of follow-up. This case highlights the risk of anchoring bias in acute pediatrics, the necessity of malignancy surveillance, and the favorable impact of timely immunotherapy in OMAS.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.