MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.25-0264

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025

Efficacy of Spatial Repellents in Malaria Prevention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Prager Marlene, Bergmann Felix, Pracher Lena, Zeitlinger Markus, Jorda Anselm

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The efficacy of spatial repellents in preventing malaria infections is unclear. In the present study, a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials conducted in China, Indonesia, and Kenya, involving 6,745 participants, was conducted to assess the efficacy of spatial repellents in reducing malaria infections. The risk of malaria infection was lower with the use of spatial repellents (681 [20.0%] of 3,399 participants) compared with controls (1,055 [31.0%] of 3,346 participants), resulting in a 52% risk reduction (pooled risk ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.70; P <0.001). No statistically significant effects on mosquito density (mean difference -10.0; 95% CI: -29.6 to 9.7), measured via human landing catch, or sporozoite rates (82 [0.007%] of 12,321 mosquitoes versus 79 [0.006%] of 14,151 mosquitoes; risk ratio: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.54) were observed. High statistical and methodological heterogeneity limited the certainty of pooled estimates. In this meta-analysis, spatial repellents were associated with a substantial reduction in malaria infections, supporting their role as a complementary intervention for malaria prevention.

Для цитирования: Prager Marlene, Bergmann Felix, Pracher Lena, Zeitlinger Markus, Jorda Anselm. Efficacy of Spatial Repellents in Malaria Prevention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2025. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.25-0264.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.