DOI 10.1186/s12933-025-02868-5
Prognostic impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients undergoing rotational atherectomy during PCI.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The combined predictive value of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in rotational atherectomy (RA) patients during the PCI remains unclear. The study examined whether the co-occurrence of DM and CMD, determined by angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in RA patients influences clinical outcomes.
METHODS
This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study involving 452 patients at 3 medical centers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 24 months after the procedure, encompassing cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and readmission for unstable angina.
RESULTS
The post-PCI angio-IMR was lower in the non-DM group compared to the DM group (17.40 [13.86-21.34] vs. 18.53 [14.63-23.01], p = 0.037). Patients with DM had a higher risk of MACEs at 24 months than those without DM (17.42% vs. 9.49%, p = 0.011). CMD was defined as post-PCI angio-IMR ≧ 25.Patients with CMD demonstrated a statistically significant elevated risk of MACEs at the 24-month follow-up, when compared to individuals without CMD (26.77% vs. 10.54%, p < 0.001). In comparison to others, patients with both DM and CMD had the highest incidence of MACEs. Specifically, DM combined with CMD was the strongest independent predictor of MACEs (DM + CMD; HR: 5.61, 95% CI, 2.606-12.083, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
This study reveals that both T2DM and CMD are associated with the risk of MACEs in RA patients during the PCI. Combing T2DM and CMD can further improve the accessibility to predict the risk of MACEs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.