Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
Impact of inter-lesion distance and first-pass isolation on outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bo Dan, Zhao Dongsheng, Dong Yan, Zhao Wei, Chen Qiushi, Yadav Nishant, Kojodjojo Pipin, Zhang Fengxiang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Contiguity of ablation lesions is a critical determinant of success for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Evidence supports maintaining an inter-lesional distance (ILD) ≤ 6 mm during pulmonary venous isolation (PVI). Meanwhile, first-pass isolation (FPI) on PVI outcome in follow-up was not deeply studied. The impact of ILD and FPI on PAF ablation outcomes was investigated.
METHODS: Consecutive PAF patients who underwent first-time antral PVI were recruited. Coordinates of ablation points were extracted from the electro-anatomical mapping system and analyzed using custom-developed software to determine the ILD. A gap is defined as ILD greater than 6 mm. FPI was defined as the achievement of PVI by encircling the ipsilateral veins while simultaneously recording their electrical activity using a multipolar catheter. The primary endpoint was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL) lasting longer than 30 s during follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent first-time antral PVI. During 13.3 ± 0.6 months of follow-up, atrial arrhythmias recurrence was noted in 22.9% of the patients. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in patients with more gaps (> 2) (37.0% versus 11.9%, P < 0.01), and the number of gaps was an independent predictor of AF/AT/AFL recurrence. (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, P = 0.02). The group with FPI for at least one ipsilateral pair of PVs exhibited a decreased number of gaps (2.0 versus 7.0, P < 0.01) and demonstrated a significant correlation with a reduction of recurrence (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.71, P = 0.01). Among 16 patients who underwent repeat ablation, the number of gaps during the index PVI was associated with PV reconnection (PVR) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Gaps created during PVI are a modifiable determinant of AF/AT/AFL recurrence, and avoidance of gaps is crucial to improve clinical outcomes of PAF ablation. In addition, FPI exhibited a strong predictive capability for clinical success in patients with PAF.
METHODS: Consecutive PAF patients who underwent first-time antral PVI were recruited. Coordinates of ablation points were extracted from the electro-anatomical mapping system and analyzed using custom-developed software to determine the ILD. A gap is defined as ILD greater than 6 mm. FPI was defined as the achievement of PVI by encircling the ipsilateral veins while simultaneously recording their electrical activity using a multipolar catheter. The primary endpoint was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL) lasting longer than 30 s during follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent first-time antral PVI. During 13.3 ± 0.6 months of follow-up, atrial arrhythmias recurrence was noted in 22.9% of the patients. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in patients with more gaps (> 2) (37.0% versus 11.9%, P < 0.01), and the number of gaps was an independent predictor of AF/AT/AFL recurrence. (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, P = 0.02). The group with FPI for at least one ipsilateral pair of PVs exhibited a decreased number of gaps (2.0 versus 7.0, P < 0.01) and demonstrated a significant correlation with a reduction of recurrence (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.71, P = 0.01). Among 16 patients who underwent repeat ablation, the number of gaps during the index PVI was associated with PV reconnection (PVR) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Gaps created during PVI are a modifiable determinant of AF/AT/AFL recurrence, and avoidance of gaps is crucial to improve clinical outcomes of PAF ablation. In addition, FPI exhibited a strong predictive capability for clinical success in patients with PAF.