Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2024
An artificial intelligence system for chronic atrophic gastritis diagnosis and risk stratification under white light endoscopy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tao Xiao, Zhu Yijie, Dong Zehua, Huang Li, Shang Renduo, Du Hongliu, Wang Junxiao, Zeng Xiaoquan, Wang Wen, Wang Jiamin, Li Yanxia, Deng Yunchao, Wu Lianlian, Yu Honggang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnosis and stratification of gastric atrophy (GA) predict patients' gastric cancer progression risk and determine endoscopy surveillance interval. We aimed to construct an artificial intelligence (AI) system for GA endoscopic identification and risk stratification based on the Kimura-Takemoto classification.
METHODS: We constructed the system using two trained models and verified its performance. First, we retrospectively collected 869 images and 119 videos to compare its performance with that of endoscopists in identifying GA. Then, we included original image cases of 102 patients to validate the system for stratifying GA and comparing it with endoscopists with different experiences.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of model 1 was higher than that of endoscopists (92.72% vs. 76.85 %) at image level and also higher than that of experts (94.87% vs. 85.90 %) at video level. The system outperformed experts in stratifying GA (overall accuracy: 81.37 %, 73.04 %, p = 0.045). The accuracy of this system in classifying non-GA, mild GA, moderate GA, and severe GA was 80.00 %, 77.42 %, 83.33 %, and 85.71 %, comparable to that of experts and better than that of seniors and novices.
CONCLUSIONS: We established an expert-level system for GA endoscopic identification and risk stratification. It has great potential for endoscopic assessment and surveillance determinations.
METHODS: We constructed the system using two trained models and verified its performance. First, we retrospectively collected 869 images and 119 videos to compare its performance with that of endoscopists in identifying GA. Then, we included original image cases of 102 patients to validate the system for stratifying GA and comparing it with endoscopists with different experiences.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of model 1 was higher than that of endoscopists (92.72% vs. 76.85 %) at image level and also higher than that of experts (94.87% vs. 85.90 %) at video level. The system outperformed experts in stratifying GA (overall accuracy: 81.37 %, 73.04 %, p = 0.045). The accuracy of this system in classifying non-GA, mild GA, moderate GA, and severe GA was 80.00 %, 77.42 %, 83.33 %, and 85.71 %, comparable to that of experts and better than that of seniors and novices.
CONCLUSIONS: We established an expert-level system for GA endoscopic identification and risk stratification. It has great potential for endoscopic assessment and surveillance determinations.