Disability and health journal · 2025
Training medical providers to serve diverse deaf patients: Age-based intervention effects in a randomized trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Melissa L, Wilkins Alexander M, Riker Timothy, Franck Nayo Lim, McGinnis Felicia, McGovern Rhys, Carter Jessica, Aquino Camille, Wang Bo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Deaf American Sign Language users are severely underserved in the U.S. healthcare system. To address longstanding inaccessibility and mistrust, our Deaf community-led team produced a film to train providers to better serve Deaf patients - Vital Signs.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate preliminary efficacy of Vital Signs among healthcare providers and health professions students.
METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to review Vital Signs or intervention as usual - standard written guidance about working with Deaf patients. Intervention completers were invited to participate in a simulation with a Deaf standardized patient. Three Deaf team members were trained to review simulation recordings and complete validated patient self-report measures of provider behavior: Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency; Ask, Understand, and Remember Assessment; and Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale.
RESULTS: Of 208 enrolled participants, 52 completed all study components and were included in final analyses. A clear pattern of results emerged - participant age influenced learning and behavior change in response to different training strategies. Participants aged 33+ who viewed Vital Signs scored higher on content knowledge compared to same-aged peers who reviewed training as usual, but worse across measures of cultural competency, communication skill, and trust-building. An opposite pattern emerged for participants younger than 33 years - those who watched Vital Signs exhibited greater cultural competence, communication skill, and trust-building abilities than same-aged peers who reviewed standard written guidance.
CONCLUSION: Future steps include an implementation trial of various Vital Signs training configurations, evaluating strategies for training health professions students versus experienced providers.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate preliminary efficacy of Vital Signs among healthcare providers and health professions students.
METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to review Vital Signs or intervention as usual - standard written guidance about working with Deaf patients. Intervention completers were invited to participate in a simulation with a Deaf standardized patient. Three Deaf team members were trained to review simulation recordings and complete validated patient self-report measures of provider behavior: Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency; Ask, Understand, and Remember Assessment; and Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale.
RESULTS: Of 208 enrolled participants, 52 completed all study components and were included in final analyses. A clear pattern of results emerged - participant age influenced learning and behavior change in response to different training strategies. Participants aged 33+ who viewed Vital Signs scored higher on content knowledge compared to same-aged peers who reviewed training as usual, but worse across measures of cultural competency, communication skill, and trust-building. An opposite pattern emerged for participants younger than 33 years - those who watched Vital Signs exhibited greater cultural competence, communication skill, and trust-building abilities than same-aged peers who reviewed standard written guidance.
CONCLUSION: Future steps include an implementation trial of various Vital Signs training configurations, evaluating strategies for training health professions students versus experienced providers.