m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Updates in surgery · 2026

Transanal drainage tube placement in patients with temporary ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Hoshino Nobuaki, Hida Koya, Tsukada Yuichiro, Obama Kazutaka, Watanabe Jun, Fukunaga Yosuke, Hirano Yasumitsu, Sakamoto Kazuhiro, Hamamoto Hiroki, Yoshimitsu Masanori, Horie Hisanaga, Matsuhashi Nobuhisa, Kuriu Yoshiaki, Nagai Shuntaro, Hamada Madoka, Yoshioka Shinichi, Ohnuma Shinobu, Hayama Tamuro, Otsuka Koki, Inoue Yusuke, Ueda Kazuki, Toiyama Yuji, Maruyama Satoshi, Yamaguchi Shigeki, Tanaka Keitaro, Suzuki Motoko, Misumi Toshihiro, Naitoh Takeshi, Watanabe Masahiko, Ito Masaaki, Ultimate Trial Group

Аннотация

Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication after surgery for rectal cancer. The prevention of anastomotic leakage is important, and prevention methods include temporary ileostomy and transanal drainage tubes. In clinical practice, a TDT is often used in combination with a temporary ileostomy. Many studies have compared ileostomy and TDT; however, there are few reports on the additive effects of TDT in patients with temporary ileostomy. We included patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer (cT1-2/N0/M0) located within 5 cm of the anal verge at 47 specialized centers in Japan between 2014 and 2017. Gastrointestinal anastomosis was performed in the patients, and a temporary ileostomy was created. Eligible patients were matched 1:1 based on propensity scores for the presence or absence of TDT. Postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between TDT and non-TDT groups. Of 299 cases collected, 252 were eligible for inclusion. After propensity score matching, 166 patients (83 per group) were included. In the TDT group, there was a significant delay in urinary catheter removal (4.3 ± 0.3 vs. 3.5 ± 0.3 days, P = 0.028) and prolonged hospital stay (20.2 ± 1.1 vs. 17.5 ± 1.1 days, P = 0.027). However, there were no significant differences in the number of anastomotic leakages (grade I, 1 vs. 1; grade II, 2 vs. 1; and grade III, 2 vs. 2; P = 1.000) or other postoperative complications between the groups. In patients in which a temporary ileostomy is created during lower rectal cancer surgery, the need for TDT is considered insignificant.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты